摘要
以大剂量强的松(P组)治疗18例特发性肺纤维化(IPF)作为对照,与间断静脉滴注环磷酰胺(CTX)加小剂量强的松(C+P)组治疗的16例IPF患者进行了对比观察。C+P组的好转率为75%,动脉氧分压(PaO_2)由治疗前的6.80±2.13kPa升至8.98±2.20kPa(P<0.01),肺活量(VC)由1.46±0.57升至2.08±0.52升(P<0.01),患者对间断静脉应用CTX耐受良好,病死率6.25%。P组的好转率仅为27.6%,PaO_2和VC与治疗前相比均无显著变化(P>0.05),22.2%的患者出现明显的糖皮质激素副作用,病死率高达27.6%。研究表明,C+P是治疗IPF较好的方法,其疗效显著优于大剂量强的松,多数患者耐受良好。
We compared the effect of intermittent, intravenous cyclophosphamide (CTX) and low dose prednisone (C ± P) in 16 patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)with that of high dose prednisone alone(P)in 18 cases of IFF. After 3 months' treatment, of the 16 Patients in the group C ± P, 12 improved (75%), 1 died (6.25%). Their mean arterial oxygen tension(PaO2) and vital capacity (VC) were increased from 6.80±2.13kPa and 1.46±0.57 liters to 8.98±2.20kPa (P<0.01) and2.08± 0.52 liters (P<0.01) respectively. Patients were well tolerated to the use of intermittent, intravenous CTX. Of the 18 patients in the group P, however, only 5 improved (27.6%), and 5 died (27.6%). Their mean PaO2 and VC were not significantly changed before and after treatment (P>0.05). Four patients in group P developed serious co-rticosteroid side effects. The study showed that the intermittent, intravenous CTX and low dose prednisone therapy was better for IPF than high dose prednisone alone.
出处
《天津医药》
CAS
1994年第7期409-411,共3页
Tianjin Medical Journal
关键词
环磷酰胺
强的松
肺纤维化
cyclophosphamide prednisone idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis