关于债权让与通知的几个问题——兼评最高人民法院相关司法解释与判决

A Few Problems About the Transference Notification of Credit——A comment on the related judicial interpretations and judgment of the Supreme People's Court

债权让与通知属于需要受领的准法律行为,让与通知实际到达债务人时对债务人发生效力。最高人民法院关于可以通过公告的方式通知债务人债权转让事实,或者催收债权、中断诉讼时效的规定、判决,缺乏法理支持,违反了民法的平等原则,损害了债务人合法权益,实际上也不可行。

The transference notification of credit is a quasi-juristic act, which goes into effect when delivered to the debtor. Short of the support of the theory of law, violating the principle of equality of the civil law and impairing the legal rights of the debtor, the stipulations and hence the judgment of the Supreme People's Court that the creditor may notify the debtor in an announcement the transferred credit, press for the payment of debts or interrupt the prescription lack feasibility in practice.