期刊文献+

安全哲学新理念:“优态共存” 被引量:39

″Superior Co-existence″: A New Concept in Security Philosophy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 理解安全内涵的不同视角,导致了不同的安全实现的可能性限度。"优态共存"的安全哲学新理念源于《易经》"保合太和"的安全思维,合于"建构主义"的安全理论。"优态共存"倡导"和合共建"的安全模式,以超越"隔离防守"、"进攻拓展"、"结盟协作"的安全模式及其相应的"防御性现实主义"、"进攻性现实主义"、"新自由主义"的安全观,并为非传统安全的维护确定重视"人的安全"、"社会安全"与"全球安全"的价值取向。 The presentation offers a new concept in security philosophy, ″superior co-existence″,inspired by the ″Baohe Taihe(保合太和)″security approach in The Book of Changes(《易经》).The security problem is the most important thing in the existence of human beings. It is the basic value for human pursuit and the first strategic goal of national development. Security philosophy is the reflection of theory concerning how to live safely, and how a situation of security could be realized. According to the security philosophy, the interpretation of the nature of security would restrict the possible means of achieving security. If one is to interpret security as ″the absence of threats″, a hostile situation is likely to occur to guard against threats. If security is understood as ″interactive cooperation″, it will lead to a superior state of co-existence.In the history of China, the prevalent interpretation of security is to obey the rule of peace and cooperation. The best representative of this is The Book of Changes. It is a first book for security and a remarkable book dealing with special security consciousness, security principle, and security category. The Book of Changes puts forward a new concept of broad security in light of the relevance of security to the existing situation of human beings. It explores the theoretical paradigms of security according to the ″The Doctrine of the Mean (Zhong Yong)″. Therefore, the Chinese have had a broader and more cooperated sense of security thinking from ancient times to now.In fact, threat and fear are strong words to alert vigilance in life, and are always connected with the experience of danger, or with history of nation's survival. If we only regard security as the ″absence of threat″, then we will find the ″threat″, even though it may sometimes be only an illusion. Therefore, we will inevitably find the imagery enemy and vengeance will constantly be on our minds. If we could pursue the target of security value as superior co-existence, we will enter a realm of ″you are safe so am I″. ″Superior co-existence″ advocates the security model of peace and cooperation, and this will go beyond the traditional model of defense or invasion or alliance. It is supported by the theory of constructionism and the (″Baohe) Taihe (保合太和)″——security approach in The Book of Changes. ″Superior co-existence″ represents the psychological situation of ″I am safe if you are safe and you are safe if I am safe too″. In the world of political value, the idea of ″superior co-existence″ places more importance on ″human security″, ″social security″ and ″Global security″ than on ″national security″.Finally, from the perspective of global ethics and the value orientation of non-traditional security strategy, the Presentation attempts to offer the theoretical proof of the inevitability of ″superior co-existence″.
作者 余潇枫
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2005年第2期5-12,共8页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
关键词 安全 安全哲学 优态共存 非传统安全 安全合作 security security philosophy superior co-existence non-traditional security security cooperation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Michael Walzer.Arguing about War[M].New Haven:Yale University Press,2004.
  • 2James Der Derian.The Value of Security: Hobbes, Marx, Nietzsche, and Baudrillard[A].Ronnie D.Lipschutz(ed.).On Security[C].New York: Columbia University Press,1995.
  • 3Judy Pearsall,Bill Trumble.The Oxford English Reference Dictionary[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1995.
  • 4Terry Terriff.Security Studies Today[M].Cambridge:Polity Press,1999.
  • 5余潇枫.从危态对抗到优态共存——广义安全观与非传统安全战略的价值定位[J].世界经济与政治,2004(2):8-13. 被引量:61
  • 6Barry Buzan.Response to Kolodziej[J].Arms Control,1992,(12):485.
  • 7Alexander Wendt.Social Theory of International Politics[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1999.
  • 8Muthiah Alagappa.Asian Security Order:Instrumental and Normative Features[M].Stanford:Stanford University Press,2003.
  • 9P.W.Singer.Corporate Warriors:The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry[M].New York:Cornell University Press,2003.
  • 10高清海 余潇枫.《“类哲学”与人的现代化》[J].中国社会科学(英文版),2001,.

二级参考文献33

  • 1Terry Terriff,Security Studies Today,Cambridge:Polity Press,1999,p.10.
  • 2Joseph S.Nye,Jr.,"East Asian Security :The Case for Deep Engagement,"Foreign Affairs,Vol.74,No.4,July/August 1995,p.91.
  • 3Terry Terriff,Security Studies Today,pp.1-3.
  • 4Ian Bellany,"Towards a Theory of International Security,"in Barry Buzan,ed.,People,States and Fear:An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post -Cold War Era,Second Edition,Hearfordshire:Jarvester Wheatsheaf,1991,p.16.
  • 5Terry Terriff,Security Studies Today,p.2.
  • 6Terry Terriff,Security Studies Today,p.10.
  • 7Barry Buzan,People ,States and Fear:An Agenda for International Security Sudies in the Post -Cold War Era,Second Edition,1991.
  • 8Muthiah Alagappa,ed., Asian Security Order:Instrumental and Normative Features,Palo Alto:Stanford University Press,2003,p.536.
  • 9Terry Terriff,Security Studies Today,p.118.
  • 10Barry Buzan,People ,States and Fear:An Agenda for International Security Sudies in the Post -Cold War Era,Second Edition,pp.19-20.

共引文献60

同被引文献575

引证文献39

二级引证文献375

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部