期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

证据冲突的衡量方法研究 被引量：12

Study on Measure Method for Conflict of Evidences
下载PDF
导出
摘要 　对于有冲突的证据,D-S证据理论无法使用或得出错误的结果,解决该问题的基础首先是研究证据冲突的衡量方法.分析了D-S证据理论在合成冲突证据时遇到的问题,定义了一些衡量证据间冲突程度的参数,包括证据一致度、证据冲突度、证据冲突强度、证据冲突/一致度等.通过实例证实了这些参数能够较好地说明证据间存在冲突的程度. With conflict of evidences, Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory either cannot be used or will work out false results. The basis of solving the problems is to study the measure of conflicting evidences. The problems of conflicting evidence combination with D-S evidence theory are analyzed. Some parameters to measure the extent of conflict of evidences are defined, such as evidence consistent degree, evidence conflict degree, evidence conflict intensity and evidence consistent/inconsistent intensity. Effectiveness of the parameters is shown with some examples, which have proved that these parameters can show the extent of conflict of evidences.
作者 杨风暴
机构地区 中北大学电子信息工程系
出处 《华北工学院学报》 EI 2005年第1期58-60,共3页 Journal of North China Institute of Technology
基金 山西省自然科学基金资助 华北工学院科学基金资助
关键词 衡量方法 冲突 程度 问题 定义 基础 实例 错误 参数 例证 evidence theory conflicting evidence evidence conflict Intensity measure
分类号 TH776 [机械工程—精密仪器及机械] F270 [经济管理—企业管理]
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Levre E, Colot O, et al. A generic framework for resolving the conflict in the combination of belief structures[C].The 3rd International Conference on Information Fusion, July 2000, Paris, France.
  • 2王壮,胡卫东,郁文贤,庄钊文.基于均衡信度分配准则的冲突证据组合方法[J].电子学报,2001,29(z1):1852-1855. 被引量：18
  • 3Braun J J. Dempster-shafer theory and bayesian reasoning in muhisensor data fusion[J]. In Sensor Fusion: Architectures, Algorithm, and Application IV, Belur V. Dasarathy, Proceedings of SPIE, 2000, 4051: 255-266.

二级参考文献9

  • 1[1]Zadeh.A simple view of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination [J].AI Magazinge,1986:85-90.
  • 2[2]P Smets.The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model[J].IEEE Trans.on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,1990,12(5):447-458.
  • 3[3]G Shafer,R logan.Implementing Dempster's rule for hierarchical evidence [J].Artificial Intelligence,1987,33:271-298.
  • 4[4]R R Yager.On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules [J].Information Sciences,1987,41:93-138.
  • 5[5]D Dubois,H Prade.Represent and combination of uncertainty with belief functions and possibility measures [J].Comput.Intelll.1988,4:244-264.
  • 6[6]E Levre,O Colot,et al.A generic framework for resolving the conflict in the combination of belief structures [A] .The 3rd International Conference on Information Fusion,July 2000,Paris,France.
  • 7[7]R R Yager.On the aggregation of prioritized belief structures [J].IEEE Trans.on SMC-Part A:Systems and Humnans,1996,26(6) :708-717.
  • 8[8]C J Lian.A conservative approach to distributed belief fusion [A].The 3rd International Conference on Information Fusion,July 2000,Paris,France.
  • 9[9]B E Tonn.An algorithmic approach to combining belief functions.International Journal of Intalligent Systems,1996,11 (7):463-476.

共引文献17

同被引文献84

引证文献12

二级引证文献45

华北工学院学报
2005年 第1期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部