期刊文献+

辨析三机关互相制约和检察监督引发的几点思考

Several thoughts caused by discriminating three judicial organs checking each other from procuratorial supervision
下载PDF
导出
摘要 制约和监督是限制国家权力的两种方式。刑事诉讼是强大的国家向孤立的个人发动的一场追诉活动 ,运行其中的国家权力应当受到限制。作为刑事诉讼基本原则的三机关互相制约和检察监督 ,是刑事诉讼中有中国特色的限制国家权力方式 ,两者存在本质区别。检察机关对未生效裁判的抗诉不属于检察监督范畴。我国应当赋予人民法院对检察机关提起公诉以独立的司法审查权。 Restriction and supervision are two patterns of limiting national powe r. Criminal proceedings is the activity which powerful state investigates single— person who has committed a crime. The national power should be limited. As basic principles in the criminal proceedings, the three judicial organs checking each other and the procuratorial supervision, are chinese—characteristic modes of limiting national power. There are some essential distinctions between them. In the light of some problems exist presently, this article advances some viewpoints: The protest against an ineffective judgment or order is not the part of procuratorial supervision; The court must be endowed with the power of independently judicial review toward the public prosecution.
作者 黄庆芳
出处 《法治论丛(上海大学法学院上海市政法管理干部学院学报)》 2001年第3期58-61,共4页 Law Journal of Shanghai Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics & Law
关键词 检察监督 国家权力 刑事诉讼 检察机关 限制 制约 司法审查权 方式 中国特色 中国 National power Proceedings Restriction Supervision
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部