期刊文献+

任务转换中的执行控制研究 被引量:4

Review on the Researches of Executive Control in Task Switching
下载PDF
导出
摘要 个体的认知活动总是在不同的任务之间转换。有关任务转换中的执行控制的研究,一般把任务转换分为同时性程序和继时性程序两种类型。目前主要有 6 种理论解释:“从注意到行动”理论(ATA)、“前额叶执行”理论(FLE)、执行控制阶段模型(SMEC)、“策略性反应—延迟”理论(SRD)、两成分模型(TCM)以及平行分配加工理论(PDP)。这些理论从不同的角度阐述了任务转换中的执行控制机制。它们之间相对独立而又紧密联系,为探讨个体的认知机制提供了重要的理论基础。 Individuals’cognitive abilities are always shifted among different tasks. As to the researches of the executive control in task switching, usually the switching procedures can be divided into two categories: simultaneous-tasks procedure and successive-tasks procedure. At present, in the researches of the executive control in task switching, there are mainly 6 theoretical explanations: Attention-to-Action(ATA) theory, Frontal-Lobe Executive(FLE) theory, Stage Model of Executive Control(SMEC), Strategic Response-Deferment theory(SRD), Two-Component Model(TCM) and Parallel Distribution Process(PDP) theory. These theories explain the executive control mechanism in task switching from different points, and they are relative independent but correlated with each other to some degree, providing an important theoretical base for exploring individuals’cognitive processing.
作者 魏勇刚 李红
出处 《西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第2期36-40,共5页 Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
基金 全国教育科学"十五"规划重点项目(DBA010164) 中国科学院重要方向项目(KSCX2-SW-221)。
关键词 任务转换 执行控制 转换程序 理论解释 task switching executive control switching procedure theoretical explanations
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1李红,王乃弋.论执行功能及其发展研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(2):426-430. 被引量:80
  • 2王爱平,张厚粲.用PDP模型模拟Stroop任务的实验研究[J].心理学报,1994,26(1):28-34. 被引量:4
  • 3Altmann E M. Task switching and the pied homunculus: Where are we being led?[J].Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2003,7:340-341.
  • 4Gopher D, Armony L, Greenshpan Y. Switching tasks and attention policies[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2000, 129: 308-339.
  • 5Logan G D, Gordon R D. Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations[J]. Psychological Review, 2001, 108: 393-434.
  • 6Altmann E M. The preparation effect in task switching: Carryover of SOA[J]. Memory & Cognition, 2004,32: 153-163.
  • 7Rubinstein J, Meyer D E, Evans J E. Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2001, 27: 763-797.
  • 8Bertelson P. Central intermittency 20 yeas later[J]. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966, 18: 153-164.
  • 9Monsell S, Yeung N, Azuma R. Reconfiguration of task-set: Is it easier to switch to the weaker task?[J] Psychology Research, 2000, 63: 250-264.
  • 10Norman D A, Shallice T. Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior[A]. In: R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro, Consciousness and self-regulation[M]. New York: Plenum, 1986. 1-18.

二级参考文献22

  • 1Diamond A. Neuropsychological insights into the meaning of object concept development. In: Carey S, Gelman R. The epigenesis of mind: Essays on biology and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum,1991, 67- 110.
  • 2Zelazo P D, Frye D. Cognitive complexity and control: A theory for the development of deliberate reasoning and intentional acion. In:Stamenov M. Language Structure, Discourse and the Access to Consciousness. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1998.
  • 3gelazo P D, Carter A, Reznick J S, Frye D. Eearly Development of Executive Function: A Problem-Solving Framework. Review of General Psychology, 1997, 2:198 - 226.
  • 4Pemer J, Birgit Lang. What causes 3-year olds' difficulty on the Dimensional Change Card Sorting Task? Infant & Child Development, 2002, 11 : 93 - 105.
  • 5Zelazo P D, Miiller U. Executive function in typical and atypical development, ln: Goswami U. Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002 : 445 -469.
  • 6Frye D, Zelazo P D, Palfai T. Theory of mind and rule-based reasoning. Cognitive Development,1995, 10:483 - 527.
  • 7Jacques S, Zelazo P D. The Flexible Item Selection Task (FIST) : A measure of executive function in pre~'hoolers. Developmental Neuropsychology, 2001. 20: 573- 591.
  • 8Zelazo P D, Sommerville J A, Nichols S. Age-related changes in children ' s use of external representations. Developmental Psychology, 1999, 35: 1059-1071.
  • 9Zelazo P D, Jacques S. Children's rule use: Representation,reflection, and cognitive control. In: Vasta R. Annals of Child Development. Lonson: Jessica Kingsley Press, 1997:119- 176.
  • 10Gerstadt C L, Hong Y J, Diamond A. The relationship between cognition and action: Performance of children 3 1/2 -7 years old on a Stroop-like dayight test. Cognition, 1994, 53: 129-153.

共引文献91

同被引文献39

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部