期刊文献+

妊娠期糖代谢异常对巨大儿发生率及其他相关问题的影响 被引量:90

Influences of abnormal carbohydrate metabolism during pregnancy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 通过大样本资料研究妊娠期糖代谢异常对巨大儿发生的影响。 方法 回顾性研究1995年 1月至 2 0 0 1年 3月在北京大学第一医院妇产科产前进行了妊娠糖尿病 (gestationaldiabetesmelli tus ,GDM )的相关检查并分娩的 865 6例孕妇的临床资料。 结果  (1) 865 6例孕妇分娩巨大儿 70 0例 ,发生率 8.1%。 (2 )糖代谢异常孕妇巨大儿发生率为 12 .5 % (69/5 5 2 ) ,显著高于糖代谢正常孕妇的 7.8%(63 1/810 4) (P <0 .0 1)。 (3 )非GDM孕妇中 ,5 0g葡萄糖负荷试验 (glucosechallengetest ,GCT)异常孕妇的巨大儿发生率为 10 .7% (177/165 1) ,GCT正常者为 7.0 % (4 5 4/64 5 3 ) ,二者比较差异有显著性 (P <0 .0 1)。(4 )A2 型GDM孕妇巨大儿发生率为 13 .8% ,显著高于A1型的 6.0 % (P <0 .0 1)。 (5 ) 2 5岁以下孕妇巨大儿发生率为 5 .9% ,3 5岁以上孕妇的巨大儿发生率为 9.9% ,糖代谢异常的高龄孕妇巨大儿发生率为 18.2 %。 (6)孕 2 6~ 2 8周时孕妇的平均体重指数 (BMI)为 (2 4.9± 2 .9) ,BMI≥ 2 7.8组孕妇巨大儿发生率为16.2 % ,显著高于其他孕妇的 6.3 % ,糖代谢正常但BMI≥ 2 7.8的孕妇巨大儿发生率为 15 .9% ,与同时为GDM的 18.3 %的巨大儿率无统计学差异。 结论  (1)尽管对妊娠期糖尿病进行? Objective To investigate the impact of the gestational diabetes mellitus and abnormal glucose challenge test (GCT) on macrosomia. Methods Clinical data of 8656 pregnant women who had antenatal care and delivered in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the First Hospital of Peking University from Jan 1995 to Mar 2001 were retrospectively analyzed. All of them underwent 50 g GCT. Results The incidence of macrosomia was 8.1% (700/8656). The incidence of macrosomia in GDM or IGT women was 12.5%(69/552), which was significantly higher than that of other women with normal glucose level 7.8%(631/8104, P <0.01). Significant difference was shown between the incidence of macrosomia in abnormal and normal GCT group [10.7%(177/1651) vs 7.0% (454/6453), P <0.01]. The macrosomia rate in women with GDM type A 2 (13.8%) was significantly higher than that of women with GDM type A 1 (6.0%, P <0.01). The rate of macrosomia among the women under age of 25 (5.9%) was lower than of the women over 35 (9.9%, P <0.01). The macrosomia rate in elder women with GDM or IGT (18.2%) was higher than that of women without. The average body mass index (BMI) of the women between 26~28 gestational weeks was (24.9±2.9). The women with BMI ≥27.8 had a macrosomia rate of 16.2% which was higher than that of the others (6.3%, P <0.01). The obese women without GDM or IGT had a similar rate of macrosomia (15.9%) to women with GDM (18 3%). Conclusions Women with GIGT or GDM remain have a higher rate of macrosomia although the the glucose level was under control, especially in GDM type A 2. More attention should be paid to its management and surveillance. Abnormal GCT, older age and obesity are important high risk factors for macrosomia besides GDM or IGT.
出处 《中华围产医学杂志》 CAS 2005年第1期9-12,共4页 Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine
关键词 巨大儿 发生率 孕妇 糖代谢异常 GDM BMI 妊娠期 严格 结论 差异 Diabetes, gestational Fetal macrosomia
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1乐杰.妇产科学(第5版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.112.
  • 2杨慧霞,周世梅.妊娠期糖尿病孕妇围产儿预后的临床分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,1993,28(3):139-142. 被引量:98
  • 3时春艳,张云燕,金燕志,董悦.阴道超声测量子宫颈长度及宫颈管宽度对预测早产的价值[J].中华妇产科杂志,2003,38(5):264-266. 被引量:62
  • 4Jimenez-Moleon JJ, Bueno-Cavanillas A, Luna-del-Castillo Jde D, et al. Impact of different levels of carbohydrate intolerance on neonatal outcomes classically associated with gestational diabetes mellitus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Bio, 2002, 102:36-41.
  • 5Lucas MJ, Lowe TW, Bowe L, et al. Class A1 gestational diabetes: a meaningful diagnosis? Obstet Gynecol, 1993, 82: 260-265.
  • 6Fernando A. High risk pregnancy and delivery. 1st. Louis:Mosby, 1984, 121-126.
  • 7Cunningham FG, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, et al. Williams Obstetrics. 21st ed. New York: Appleton Lange, 2001, 1360.
  • 8Casey BM, Lucas MJ, McIntire DD, et al. Population impact of universal screening for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1999,180:536-541.
  • 9Cunningham FG, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, et al. Williams Obstetrics, 21st ed. New York: Appleton Lange, 2001, 758.
  • 10Scholl TO, Sowers MF, Chen X, et al. Maternal glucose concentration influences fetal growth, gestation, and pregnancy complications. Am J Epidemiol, 2001, 154:514-520.

二级参考文献11

  • 1叶美美,翁霞云.应用阴道超声波观察妊娠晚期子宫颈成熟度[J].中华妇产科杂志,1994,29(11):657-659. 被引量:17
  • 2Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Engl J Med,1996, 334:567-572.
  • 3Bozenberg P, Goffinet F, Hessabi M, et al. Comparison of the Bishop score, ultrasonographically measured cervical length, and fetal fibronectin assay in predicting time until delivery and type of delivery at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2000, 182:108-113.
  • 4Anderson HF. Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography of the uterine cervix during pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound, 1991,19:77-80.
  • 5Owen J, Neely C, Northen A. Transperineal versus endovaginal ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in the midtrimester: a blinded comparison. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1999, 181:780-783.
  • 6Jackson GM, Ludmir J, Bader TJ, et al. The accuracy of digital examination and ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical length.Obstet Gynecol, 1992, 79: 214-218.
  • 7Murakawa H, Utumi T, Hasegawa I, et al. Evalution of threatened preterm delivery by transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Obstet Gynecol, 1993, 82:829-832.
  • 8Iams JD, Paraskos J, Landon MB, et al. Cervical sonography in preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol, 1994, 84:40-46.
  • 9严仁英,中华围产医学论文集,1990年
  • 10俞霭峰,妇产科内分泌学,1985年

共引文献338

同被引文献603

引证文献90

二级引证文献742

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部