期刊文献+

事件域认知模型及其解释力 被引量:145

The Event-Domain Cognitive Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国外一些知名认知语言学家提出许多解释概念结构和句法构造的理论模型,但基本上都存在以下三个问题:1)分析层面单一;2)侧重动态场景;3)主要针对句法。本文针对这些不足提出“事件域认知模型”,它既符合人们的正常认知规律,可解释概念结构的形成和句法构造的基础,且又可部分弥补上述三点不足之处,还可以此解释语义和交际层面中诸多现象:缺省交际、脚本理论、时段分析、间接言语行为、事体命名、词性转换、词义变化、反义同词等。可见ECM是一种有较强解释力的认知方式,这又为认知语言学强调解释语言须用统一分析法提供了一个有效的分析工具。 Some cognitive linguists have put forward theoretical models for explaining conceptual structures and syntactic constructions, but their analyses are often inadequate in that they are single-level oriented, dynamic-scenario oriented, and syntactic-constructions oriented. This paper proposes an Event-Domain Cognitive Model (ECM) in an attempt to overcome the above inadequacies. The ECM, which accords with human normal cognitive rules, can account for not only the conceptual structures and syntactic constructions but also phenomena in semantic and communicative aspects such as default-value, script, act-period analysis, indirect speech act, denomination, conversion, and ambivalent words.
作者 王寅
机构地区 四川外语学院
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第1期17-26,共10页 Modern Foreign Languages
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1谭达人.略论反义相成词[J].语文研究,1989(1):27-33. 被引量:23
  • 2王寅,李弘.体验哲学和认知语言学对句法成因的解释[J].外语学刊,2003(1):20-25. 被引量:57
  • 3杨善华.当代两方社会学理论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1999..
  • 4Cook, G. 1994. Discourse and Literature [M]. OUP.
  • 5Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology [M]. Englewood Cliffs.
  • 6Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things:What Categories Reveal about the Mind[M ]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 7Langacker, R, W. 1991/2002. Concept, Image and Symbol : The Cognitive Basis of Grammar [M]. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 8Langacker, R, W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. Ⅱ. Descriptive Application [ M ]. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
  • 9Panther, KU. & L. Thornburg. 1999. The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian [A]. In Panther, KU. & G.Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
  • 10Rice, S. 1996. Propositional prototypes[A]. In Putz, M. & R. Dirven (eds.), The Construal of Space in Language and Thought [C].Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

二级参考文献10

  • 1王寅.Lakoff & Johnson笔下的认知语言学[J].外国语,2001,24(4):15-21. 被引量:71
  • 2孟琮.动词用法词典[M].上海辞书出版社,1984.
  • 3王寅.认知语言学的哲学基础:体验哲学[M].外语教学与研究,2002(2).
  • 4笔者将另文论述体验哲学和认知语言学理论对于语音、词汇、词法、隐喻等方面的解释力.
  • 5Lakoff, G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things:What Categories Reveal about the Mind[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1987.
  • 6Lakoff, G. & Mark Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh- The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Tnought[M]. New York:Basic Books, 1999.
  • 7Langacker, R, W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar vol. Ⅱ: Descriptive Applieation[M]. Stanford, California:Stanford University Press, 1991.
  • 8Langacker, R, W. Grammar and Conceptualization[M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyte,2000.
  • 9Turner, M. The Literary Mind[M]. Oxford:OUP,1996.
  • 10高云莉,方琰.浅谈汉语宾语的语义类别问题[J].语言教学与研究,2001(6):62-65. 被引量:27

共引文献78

二级引证文献506

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部