期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

非政府组织对WTO争端解决机制的介入 被引量：1

NGO Intervention in Dispute Settlement Mechanism of WTO
下载PDF
导出
摘要 非政府组织通过在成员方之间的争端解决中主动发表“法庭 之友”书面意见,积极参与世贸组织的活动,而《争端解决谅解》对此规定很不明 确。本文通过典型案例,探讨专家组和上诉机构对于该问题的态度,并分析非政 府组织介入所带来的影响和冲击。
作者 芦艳
机构地区 复旦大学
出处 《华东政法学院学报》 CSSCI 2005年第2期60-64,共5页 Journal of The East China University of Politics and Law
关键词 非政府组织 WTO争端解决机制 书面意见 法庭 上诉机构 典型案例 专家组 主动 活动
分类号 D996.1 [政治法律—经济法学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1United Sftates - Import Prohibition of certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, WT/DS58, 12 October, 1998.
  • 2August Reinisch and Christina Irgel, the Participation of Non-Governmental Organizations in the WTO Dispute Settlement System, Non-State Actors and International Law 1, 2001, p.139.
  • 3United States-Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Certain Hot-Rolled Lead and Bismouth Carbon Steel Products Originating in the United Kingdom, WT/DS138/AB/R, May,2000, WT/DS138/R, WT/DS138/AB/R.
  • 4Denise Prevost: WTO Subsidies Agreement and Privatised Companies;Appellate Body Amicus Curiae Briefs, Legal Issues of Economic Integration27(3),2000,p.287.
  • 5European Communities-Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products, WT/DS135/98,November 2000.
  • 6Jona Razzaque, Changing role of friends of the count in the International Courts and Tribunals, Non-State Actors and International Law 1,2002,p.179.
  • 7Geert A.Zonnekeyn, The Appellate Body's Communication on Amicus Curiae Briefs in the Asbestos Case, Journal of World Trade35(3),2001,p.563.
  • 8Petros C. Mavroidis, Amicus Curiae Briefs Before the WTO: Much Ado About Nothing, http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/01/010201.html(visited on June 28,2004),p.10.
  • 9Stephen P. Croley and Hackson H. John, WTO Disputes Procedures, standard of Review and Deference to National governments, 90 American Journal of International Law, 193,212(1996).
  • 10金晓晨.WTO争端解决机制下私人诉权的探讨[J].法学杂志,2003,24(2):31-32. 被引量：7

二级参考文献4

  • 1Glen T．Schleyer：Power To The People：Allowing Private Parties To Raise Claims Before The WTO Dispute Reslution System，Fordham Law Review，April 1997．
  • 2Thomas J．Schoenbaum：WTO Dispute Settlement：Praise And Suggestions For Reform，International And Comparative Law Quarterly，Vol．47，July 1998。
  • 3同[1]
  • 4[意]Michele Taruffo:Transcultural Dimension of Civil Jusice.Comparative Law Review(Vol.XXXⅢ—4,2000),Japan.

共引文献6

同被引文献12

  • 1[1]Jeffrey L.Dunoff.Tne WTO's Legitimacy,Crisis:Reflections on the Law and Polities of WTO Dispute Resolution[J].The American Review of International Arbitration,2002(13):197-218.
  • 2[2]Kal Raustiala.Sovereignty and Multilatemlism[J].Chicago Journal of International Law,2000(2):410-425.
  • 3[4]WTO center.Panel Report on US-Steel Report,WT/DSl38/R[EB/OL].[1999-12-23]:www.wto.org/English/tratop.e/disptt.e/138r-01.pdf.
  • 4[5]World Trade Law Net.Implementation of Australia-Measure Affection Importation of Salmon,WT/DS18/RW[EB/OL].[2000-04-17].http://www.worldtradelaw.net/reports/wtopanels/australia-salron(panel).pdf.
  • 5[6]World Trade Law Net.European Communities-Measures Affecting Asbestos-Containing Products,WT/DS135/9[EB/OL].[2000-11-08].http://www.worldtradelaw.net/artieles/footerasbestes.pdf.
  • 6[7]Georg C.Umbricht.An Amicus Curiae Briefs Before The WTO[J].Journal of International Economic Law,2001(3):774-794.
  • 7[8]程红星.WTO司法哲学的能动主义之维[M].北京:法律出版社,2005:166-167.
  • 8[9]Weiler,J·H·H.The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Oiplomats:Refleetions on the Internal and Extenud Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement[J].The American Review of International Arbitration.2002,13(2):177-197.
  • 9[14]Steve Charnovitz.Opening the WTO to Nongovemmettal Interests[J].Rutger Law Review,2000(24):173-216.
  • 10[16]E·博登海默.法理学:法律哲学和法律方法[M].邓正来,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004:261.

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

华东政法学院学报
2005年 第2期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部