第三人称代词“之”活用为第二人称代词说质疑

Questioning the Utilization of the-Third-Person Pronoun as the-Second-Person One

结合语境对常见的所谓用为第二人称“之”字句进行分析,根据篇章语境原则,汉语文化语境原则及言语交际的合作原则,从语用意义看,第三人称代词“之”活用为第二人称代词之说难以成立。

The so-called utilization of the pronoun 'zhi' transferred into the second-person pronoun is analyzed based on the context.According to the principle of the context, the principle of the Chinese culture context, and the principle of cooperation in parole communication and from the perspective of pragmatics,it is groundless to convince readers the utilization of the Third-Person pronoun as the Second-Person one.