期刊文献+

论多元的相干性 被引量:2

On Pluralistic Relevance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 相干性研究源远流长。迄今 ,不仅有形式逻辑对命题相干性的研究 ,而且出现非形式逻辑、论辩理论和修辞学对证明相干性、主题相干性、听众相干性和辩证相干性的多维研究。相干性的多元性质使得它不仅与论证的概念、论证的语境、对话及其类型和论证评估密切相关 ,而且与论证型式、论证重构及论证图解结合起来。 To research relevance goes back to ancient time.Up to the present, there are study of premise-relevance in formal logic, study of probative relevance, topic-relevance,audiece-relevance,and dialectical relevance in informal logic,argumentation theory and new rhetoric.Since its plurality, relevance is not only closely related to the concept of argument, context of argument,dialogue, types of dialogue and evaluating argument, and also to combine the research of relevance with argument scheme ,reconstructing argument and diagramming argument.
作者 武宏志
出处 《延安大学学报(社会科学版)》 2005年第1期21-26,共6页 Journal of Yan'an University (Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 非形式逻辑 相干性 前提相干性 证明相干性 主题相干性 听众相干性 辩证相干性 informal logic, relevance, premise-relevance probative relevance,topic-relevance, audiece-relevance,dialectical relevance
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1[1]R.H.Johnson.,&J.A.Blair.Logical Self-defense[M].Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.1977.
  • 2[2]Douglas N.Walton. In Relevance in Argumentation[M]. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.2004.
  • 3[3]里德.对逻辑的思考[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1998.
  • 4[4]Fans H.van Eemeren,Rob Grootendorst and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. Foundamentals of Argumentation Theory:A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments[M].New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Inc.1996.
  • 5[5][8][10]J.Anthony Blair.Premise Relevance[A].Robert Maier(ed.).Norms in Argumentation[C]. Dordrecht:Foris Publications.1989.
  • 6[6]John Woods and Douglas N.Walton.Fallacies: Selected Papers 1972-1982[C]. Dordrecht:Foris Publications.1989.
  • 7[7][24]Trudy Govier. A Practical Study of Argument[M].California:Wadsworth,Inc.1992.
  • 8[9]Douglas N.Walton.Informal Logic:A Handbook for Critical Argumentation[M].Cambrige: Cambrige University Press.1989.
  • 9[11][12]Joseph W.Wenzel.Relevance-and Other norms of Agument:A Rhetorical Exploration[A].Robert Maier(ed.).Norms in Argumentation[C]. Dordrecht:Foris Publications.1989.
  • 10[13][14]Christopher W. Tindale.Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument[M]. Albany:State University of New York Press.1999.

同被引文献18

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部