期刊文献+

文化差异、相对主义与生命伦理 被引量:8

Culture Diversity, Relativism & Bioethics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 多元文化是当今世界的一个重要特征,不同的文化在道德观上的差异很容易在生命伦理学领域导致一种伦理相对主义:根据不同的文化传统,人们对同一境况下的同一行为所作的不同道德判断都同样是正确或有效的。通过对伦理相对主义三个命题(差异、相对性和宽容)的深入分析,本文认为这种伦理相对主义并不能得到有力的论证,而且会在生命伦理学领域产生许多不好的后果;面对生命伦理中的文化差异,一种温和的客观主义立场更为可取。 Cultural pluralism is one of the characters of contemporary world. People from disparate cultural backgrounds can make disparate moral judges on an act, taking place under the same circumstances. These different moral judgments can contribute to a kind of moral relativism in bioethics: disparate judgments would be equally right or valid depending on different cultural traditions. After carefully analyzing moral relativism's three propositions (diversity, relativity and tolerance), this paper contends that this kind of relativism will not be argued and that it can produce many unacceptable results. When dealing with the diversity in bioethics, mild objectivism is more advisable.
出处 《中国医学伦理学》 2005年第1期40-43,共4页 Chinese Medical Ethics
关键词 生命伦理 伦理相对主义 文化差异 宽容 bioethics,Moral Relativism,cultural diversity,tolerance
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1聂精保,赵明杰.知情同意在中国不适用吗——“文化差异论”的认知错误[J].医学与哲学,2002,23(6):18-22. 被引量:26
  • 2邱仁宗.生命伦理学:普遍主义还是相对主义? 对亚太地区文化和生命伦理学的哲学考虑[J].中国医学伦理学,1996,9(2):7-12. 被引量:4
  • 3Turner L. An anthropological exploration of contemporary bioethics: the varieties of common sense[J] .Journal of Medical Ethics,Apr 1998,24:129- 131.
  • 4Turner L. An anthropological exploration of contemporary bioethics: the varities of common sense[ J] .Journal of Medical Ethics. 1998,24:127-133.
  • 5Catherwood JF. An Argument of Intolerance [ J ]. Journal of Medical Ethics 2000,26(6) :427.
  • 6Nie JB. The Plurality of Chinese and American Medical Moralities:Toward an Interpretive Cross- Cultural Bioethics[ J].KENNEDY INSTITTUTE OF ETHICS JOURNAL,2000, September: 245-246.
  • 7Harris CE. Applying Moral Theories[M].Belmont, CA:Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1997,22- 23.
  • 8Herskovits M. Cultural Relativism[M] .New York: Random House, 1972.
  • 9Mill JS. On Liberty[M].London: Penguin, 1985.
  • 10Popper K. Facts, Standards and Truth: A Further Criticism of Relativism in Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies,5th ed. Princeton: Princeton University, 1971,369-393.

二级参考文献1

  • 1聂精保.“中、美医学道德的多元性:导向一个阐释的跨文化生命伦理学[J].中外医学哲学,2001,(4):135-135.

共引文献28

同被引文献98

引证文献8

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部