1Bocquet A. Alternatives for STM Publishing in the intemet age - Apersonal view. Presentation at Science writing seminar. National Natural Science Foundation. Beijing. July 17. 2004.
2Riedesel H. Current trends in international STM publishing.Presentation at the First Forum on Scientific Publishing. China Association For Science & Technology. Beijing. Sept. 8. 2004.
3Testa J. Journal selection process in a changing publishin genvironment. Talk presented at the Chinese Academy of Sciences.Beijing. Sept. 20. 2004.
4Daniel Greenstein. Not so quiet on a Western front. University of California. 28 May 2004. http://www. nature. com/nature/focus/accessdebate/23. html [ 2004-09 -02 ].
5Morris S. Open access and not-for-profit publishers. Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers. 19 March 2004.http ://www. nature. com/nature/focus/accessdebate [ 2004-09 -02 ].
6McCabe M J. Snyder C M. The best business model for scholarly journals: an economist's perspective. 16 July 2004. http://www.nature. com/nature/focusdaccessdebate/28. html [2004-09-02].
7Budapest Open Access Initiative. http ://www. org/openaccess/index. shtml [2004-07-21].
8Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities. http://www. zim. mpg. de/openaccess-beflin/berlindeclaration. html[ 2004-07-21 ].
9Hunter K. Open Access: yes. no. maybe. Elsevier 19 March 2004.http ://www. nature. com./nature/focus/accessdebate/ [2004-08-12].
10Haynes J. Can Open Access be viable? The Institute of Physics experience. lOP Publishing Ltd. 7 May 2004. http://www. nature.corn/nature/focus/accessdebate[2004-08-12].
