期刊文献+

基于模糊灰关联分析的软件引入决策模型 被引量:2

Decision model for software implementation based on fuzzy grey relational analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在模糊环境下提出软件引入的决策模型.该模型是基于移除分辨系数的灰关联分析,案例是评价台湾地区路面管理系统的最佳化优选问题.应用德菲法搜集的案例数据显示了省道和县、乡道主管部门对软件的认知差异和需求偏好.采用理想解趋近法(TOPSIS)比较该模型的强健性.对比结果显示两种方法均建议引入MicroPAVER5.1软件,而所提出模型的适用性比TOPSIS更为广泛. A decision model for software implementation under a fuzzy environment is developed. The model is based on the grey relational analysis which eliminates the distinguishing factor and is used for estimating the optimum option of a pavement management system in Taiwan. Case data collected by the Delphi method show the cognition difference and demand preference of superintendents in a county and in a city. The TOPSIS method is used for comparing the robustness of the model. The result shows that these two approaches all suggest implementing micro PAVER 5.1. Furthermore, the appropriateness of the developed model is more extensive than TOPSIS.
出处 《控制与决策》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2005年第3期321-324,共4页 Control and Decision
关键词 路面管理系统 软件引入 模糊灰关联分析 决策模型 Concrete pavements Decision theory Fuzzy sets Management information systems Software engineering
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1崔耀东,周儒荣,廖文和.一种选择制造业信息系统应用的决策模型[J].控制与决策,2003,18(1):73-76. 被引量:9
  • 2Ravi K, Murugan A, Magid I. Selecting IT applications in manufacturing: A KBS approach[J]. Omega, 1999, 27(6): 605-616.
  • 3Shin H, Lee J. A process model of application software package acquisition and implementation[J]. J of Systems and Software, 1996, 32(1): 57-64.
  • 4Finn F. Pavement management systems - Past, present and future[J]. Public Roads, 1998, 62(1): 16-22.
  • 5夏郭贤 吴汉雄.灰关联分析的线性数据前处理探讨.灰色系统学刊,1998,1(1):47-53.
  • 6Bingi P, Sharma M K, Godla J K. Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation[J]. Information Systems Management, 1999, 16(3): 7-14.
  • 7Chen C T. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 114(1): 1-9.

二级参考文献10

  • 1[1]Klein G, Beck P O. A decision aid for selecting among information system alternatives[J]. MIS Quart,1987,11(2):177-186.
  • 2[2]Santhanam R, Kyparisis J. A multiple criteria decision model for information system project selection[J]. Comput Oper Res,1995,22(8):807-818.
  • 3[3]Ravi K, Murugan A, Magid I. Selecting IT applications in manufacturing: A KBS approach[J]. Omega,1999,27:605-616.
  • 4[4]James J J, Gary K. Information system project-selection criteria variations within strategic classes[J]. IEEE Trans Eng Manag,1999,46(2):171-176.
  • 5[5]Sev V N, Grier C I L. A methodology to select optimal system components for computer integrated manufacturingbyevaluatingsynergy[J].Comput Integ ManufSyst,1998,11(3):217-228.
  • 6[6]Meredith J, Camm J. Modeling synergy and learning under multiple advanced manufacturing technologies[J]. Decision Science,1989,20(2):258-271.
  • 7[7]Kuei C H, Lin C, Aheto J, et al. A strategic decision model for the selection of advanced technology[J]. Int J Produc Res,1994,32(9):2117-2130.
  • 8[8]Martin P, William M, Amrik S S. Advanced manufacturing technology investment: Criteria for organizational choice and appraisal[J]. Integ Manuf Syst,1996,7(5):12-24.
  • 9[9]Sohal S A. A longitudinal study of planning and implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies[J]. Int J Comput Integ Manuf,1997,10(1-4):281-295.
  • 10[10]Siha S A. Decision model for selecting mutually exclusive alternative technologies[J]. J Comput Ind Eng,1993,24(3):459-475.

共引文献8

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部