摘要
本文通过分析当前学术界对郭店楚简儒家篇章的归属论争,提出学术界对《礼记》与《子思子》的篇章进行分隔式的划分,造成了归属问题上不必要的争执。郭店楚简中属于儒家的篇章一部分是子思及其学派的作品,可归入《子思子》;另一部分属于《子思子》释义背景的思想资源,不能归入《子思子》,但系解释子思思想来源的重要篇章。目前可以明确归入《子思子》的作品有《缁衣》、《五行》、《中庸》和《鲁穆公问子思》。
After analyzing the dispute about the Confucian's lists of content found in Guodian among the academic circles, we believe it is unnecessary to separate the contents of LiJi and ZiSiZi. Some of the Confucian's lists of content can be included in ZiSiZi, some of them can not be included in ZiSiZi, but can be used to explain ZiSi's thought. ZiYi,WuXing, ZhunYun and LuMu Duke asking ZiSi can be included in ZiSiZi unequivocally now.
出处
《青海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2005年第2期78-81,共4页
Journal of Qinghai Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
《子思子》
内容
考释
ZiSiZi
Contents
Verifying and explaining