期刊文献+

激光角膜上皮瓣下磨镶术和激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗中高度近视的对比研究 被引量:6

Comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 比较激光角膜瓣下磨镶术 (L ASEK)和激光原位角膜磨镶术 (L ASIK)治疗中高度近视的临床效果。方法 中高度近视患者 198例 (394只眼 )。其中 L ASEK手术治疗 93例 (184只眼 ) ,L ASIK手术治疗 10 5例 (2 10只眼 )。结果 术后 1天 ,L ASIK组 2 8%裸眼视力达到 1.0 ,L ASEK组无 1例裸眼视力达到 1.0。术后 1周、1、3、6月裸眼视力大于或等于 1.0者 ,两组比较差异无显著性 (P =0 .36 ,P =0 .5 8,P =0 .4 4 ,P =0 .6 4 )。角膜地形图分析平均角膜中央屈光力与周边屈光力的差异 ,L ASEK组 (0 .6 9)明显小于 L ASIK组 (2 .6 2 )。结论 L ASEK手术矫正中高度近视均有良好的治疗效果 ,是一种安全、有效、预测性好的屈光手术。 Objective To compare the effectiveness, safety, and stability of laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) with those of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the correction of moderate to high myopia. Methods 198 cases(394 eyes)of the moderate to high myopia were randomly assigned as LASEK group : 93 cases(184 eyes) with preoperative myopia - 4.00D ~ -12.00 D , astigmatic errors -0.50D ^-2.50 D and LASIK group: 105 cases(210 eyes) with preoperative myopia - 4.00D ~ - 13.00 D, astigmatic errors -0.50D ~ -3.00 D. Patients from both groups were followed postoperatively for 6 months, measuring visual acuity, manifest refraction, corneal haze, and corneal topographic meridians of 3mm,5mm,and 7mm. Results At 1 day, the uncorrected visual acuity ( UCVA) was 20/20 or better in 59 LASIK eyes (28%) and no patient in LASEK group achieved a UCVA of 20/20. There was no statistically significant difference in the UCVA of 20/20 at 1 week (P=0.36), 1 month (P=0.58), 3 months(P=0.44),and 6 months (P=0.64) between LASIK and LASEK group. It was increased in the number of eyes with low astigmatic power and decreased in the number of eyes with high astigmatic power in both groups. The incidence of corneal haze : LASEK group showed 7 % of 0.5 degree. The analysis of corneal topographic meridians showed that fewer aberrations resulted from LASEK than from LASIK. Conclusion LASEK in this study appeared safely effectively, predictable treated eyes with moderate to high myopia. LASEK has some advantages in comparison with LASIK. It avoids all the well-known complications related to the LASIK flap and it is easier .
出处 《临床眼科杂志》 2005年第1期12-15,共4页 Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Knorz MC. Flap and interface complications in LASIK. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2002,13 : 242.
  • 2Jacobs JM, Taravella MJ. Incidence of intraoperative flap complications in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg,2002, 28:23.
  • 3Ellies P. Binisti P, Dighiero P, et al. Blade defect responsible for a severe laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis complication.Arch Ophthalmol, 2002,120 : 1592.
  • 4Shah MN, Misra M , Wihelmus KR, et al. Diffuse lamellar keratitis associated with epithelial defects after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg,2000,26:1312.
  • 5Argento C, Cosentino MJ, Tytiun A, et al. Corneal ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg,2001,27:1440.
  • 6Cimberle M. LASEK has more than 1 year of successful experience. Ocular Surgery News, 2002,15 : 36 .
  • 7Lee JB, Seong GJ, Lee JH, et al. Comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for low to moderate myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg,2001,27:565-570.
  • 8Mohammad H, Dastjerdi H,Kaz Soong. LASEK (laser subepithelial keratomileusis) . Current Opinion in Ophthalmology.2002,13:261.
  • 9Scerrati E. Laser in situ keratomileusis vs. laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASIK vs. LASEK). J Refract Surg, 2001,219-221.

同被引文献54

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部