期刊文献+

确证的困境与超越的可能 被引量:2

The Problem of Justification and Its Possible Solution
下载PDF
导出
摘要 解决回溯问题是确证理论的核心。基础主义、一致主义和语境主义这三种当今流行的确证理论在这个问题上各有自己的优势,也有自身难以克服的缺陷。是否存在着这样的可能性,能够将三种理论的优势集中起来呢? 通过对知识进行分类,探讨相应的确证标准,以及提出应该接受为证据的几项主张,或许这样的尝试便可成为走出确证困境的一种新思路。 The regress argument is the most important problem of justification theories. Foundationalism, coherentism, and contextualism are the three dominant theories of justification. Though each of them has its own advantage, they all have obstacles which cannot be conquered by themselves. Is it possible to take advantages of those three into a new theory? Maybe it will be a new approach to solve the problem of justification, by classifying knowledge, choosing the more suitable criterions, and claiming what sort of evidence can be accepted.
作者 吕旭龙
机构地区 厦门大学哲学系
出处 《山西师大学报(社会科学版)》 北大核心 2005年第2期94-98,共5页 Journal of Shanxi Normal University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 确证 回溯问题 知识分类 Justification regress argument classes of knowledge
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Jack S. Crumley Ⅱ.An Introduction to Epistemology[M].Mayfield Publishing Company,1998.
  • 2See An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology[C].Oxford: Blackwell Publishers,1985.53-54.
  • 3Moser, Mulder, Trout.The Theory of Knowledge[M].A Thematic Introduction.85.
  • 4Ernest Sosa.The Raft and Pyramid[C].in Epistemology: An Anthology.148.
  • 5Alvin Plantinga. Justification in the 20th Century[C].in Knowledge and Justification, Ⅱ, ed, by Ernest Sosa, (ldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Company Limited, 1994.745.
  • 6Jennifer Trusted. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Knowledge[M].second edition. Macmilian Press Ltd, 1997.
  • 7Robert John Ackermann. Belief and Knowledge[M].Garden City, N.Y., Anchor Books,1972.
  • 8Chisholm, Roderick. Theory of Knowledge[M].second edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall,1977.

同被引文献28

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部