期刊文献+

转喻与语用推理图式 被引量:54

Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing Schemata
原文传递
导出
摘要 传统的语用学理论在解释语用推理时有两个缺陷:一是它没有解释为什么会话人进行语用推理的速度会如此迅捷和毫不费力;二是它没有探究语用推理的概念本质。本文以认知语言学中的事态场境为基础,指出事态场境组成部分与整个事态场境或场境核心之间的转喻关系是会话人进行语用推理的概念图式。这些转喻关系也解释了为什么听话人会以迅捷的速度轻松地推断出说话人的交际意图。因此,从认知语言学的角度来研究语用推理可进一步补充和丰富语用学理论。 The pragmatic theories that try to explain pragmatic inferencing have two kinds of negligence: the first is that they do not account for the fact that the hearer can infer the speaker抯 intentions without any noticeable effort; the second is that they do not explore the conceptual basis of pragmatic inferencing. This paper, based upon Cognitive Linguistics?notion of scenario, attempts to demonstrate that the metonymic relations between components of scenario and the whole scenario or its CORE constitute conceptual schemata of pragmatic inferencing and facilitate the ease of the hearer抯 understanding of the speaker抯 intentions under the influence of contextual factors. Thus investigating pragmatic inferencing from a Cognitive Linguistic perspective can further supplement and enrich the pragmatic theories.
作者 张辉 周平
机构地区 上海外国语大学
出处 《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第4期46-52,共7页 Journal of Foreign Languages
关键词 转喻 认知语言学 语用推理 场境 图式 语用学 英语 metonymy cognitive linguistics pragmatic inferencing scenario schemata
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Lakoff G. & M. Johnson Metaphors We Live By [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • 2Croft, W. The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies [J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1993, 4 (4): 335-370.
  • 3张辉.认知语义学述评[J].外语与外语教学,1999(12):4-8. 被引量:35
  • 4Thomburg, Linda & Klaus-Uwe, Panther. Speech act metonymies [A]. W. Liebert, G. Redekker & L Waugh. Discourse and Perspective in Cognitive Linguistics [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1997.
  • 5Searle. J. Indirect speech acts [A]. P. Cole & J. Morgan. Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts (Vol.3) [C]. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
  • 6Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda Tnomburg A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1998, (30): 755-769.
  • 7Panther, Klaus, Uwe & L Thomburg. The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian [A]. Panther. K & G. Radden. Metonymy in Language and Thought [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1999.
  • 8Gibbs, R. What makes some indirect speech acts conventional [J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 1986, (25): 181-196.
  • 9Gibbs, R. Speaking and thinking with metonymy [A]. Klaus-Uwe Panther & G. Radden. Metonymy in Language and Thought [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1999.
  • 10Gibbs R. The Poetics of Mind." Figurative Thought, Language & Understanding [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

共引文献34

同被引文献622

引证文献54

二级引证文献382

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部