期刊文献+

条件估值法评估环境资源价值的研究进展 被引量:128

Using Contingent Valuation Method to Value Environmental Resources: A Review
下载PDF
导出
摘要 条件估值法 (CVM)是一种利用假想市场评估环境物品价值的方法 ,凭借方法本身的灵活性、广泛的适用性和强大的提供数据来源的能力 ,4 0年来在环境价值评估领域的重要性不断上升。系统总结了CVM研究中存在的主要问题与争议 ,争议主要围绕非使用价值评估和假想市场所获数据的有效性与可靠性。针对CVM在 1993年后研究热点的转变和国际研究动向 ,论述了其有效性和可靠性检验问题。最后对CVM进行了展望与评价 ,认为即使对中国这样的发展中国家 ,CVM仍为一种富有前景的环境资源价值评估方法 ,不过必须建立在对CVM调查各个环节的精心设计、严谨实施和审慎分析的基础上。 Contingent valuation method (CVM) is a kind of stated preference (SP) approaches which employs a hypothetical market to extract WTP or WTA for environmental goods. CVM has become one of the most widely used non-market valuation techniques due to its ability and flexibility to estimate total value, including non-use value. Based on a general review, the paper summarizes the main problems and controversies concerning CVM, namely, the involvement of non-use value into cost-benefit analysis, and validity and reliability of the results. According to the turning point in CVM studies after 1993, tests of validity and reliability are specially illustrated. A concluding remark is then presented and further study areas put it forward. It is believed that even in developing countries like China, CVM is still a promising method to value environmental goods, on the premise of extremely careful and proper conduction of the survey including questionnaire design, survey administration and data processing.
作者 张茵 蔡运龙
出处 《北京大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第2期317-328,共12页 Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目 (40 335 0 4 6 )
关键词 条件估值法(CVM) 环境资源价值 有效性和可靠性检验 contingent valuation method (CVM) environmental valuation validity and reliability test
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1徐中民,张志强,程国栋,苏志勇,鲁安新,林清,张海涛.额济纳旗生态系统恢复的总经济价值评估[J].地理学报,2002,57(1):107-116. 被引量:121
  • 2张志强,徐中民,程国栋,苏志勇.黑河流域张掖地区生态系统服务恢复的条件价值评估[J].生态学报,2002,22(6):885-893. 被引量:192
  • 3杨开忠,白墨,李莹,薛领,王学军.关于意愿调查价值评估法在我国环境领域应用的可行性探讨——以北京市居民支付意愿研究为例[J].地球科学进展,2002,17(3):420-425. 被引量:96
  • 4Pearce D W, Turner R K. Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1990. 1-46.
  • 5Carson R T, Mitchell R C, Hanemann W M, et al. A Contingent Valuation Study of Lost Passive Use Values Resulting from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. Report to the Attorney General of the State of Alaska, 1992.
  • 6Carson R T, Flores N E, Meade N F. Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2001,19: 173-210.
  • 7JA迪克逊 LF斯库拉 RA卡朋特.环境影响的经济分析[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2001.27-32.
  • 8Bjornstad D J, Kahn J R. Structuring a Research Agenda to Estimate Environmental Values. In: Bjornstad D J, Kahn J R. The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources-Methodological Issues and Research Needs. Cheltenham, UK; Brookfield, US: Edward Elgar, 1996. 263-274.
  • 9Carson R T. Contingent Valuation: a User's Guide. Environmental Sciences and Technology, 2000, 34: 1413-1418.
  • 10Mitchell R C, Carson R T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: the Contingent Valuation Method. Washington D C: Resources for the Future, 1989.

二级参考文献28

  • 1中国科学院院士西北水资源考察团.关于黑河、石羊河流域合理用水和拯救生态问题的建议[J].中国科学院院刊,1996,11(1):7-9. 被引量:10
  • 2H.范里安 费方域(译).微观经济学:现代观点[M].上海:三联书店,上海人民出版社,1995.746-749.
  • 3Mitchell R C, Carson R T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method[M]. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1989.
  • 4Richard C B, Patricia A C, Daniel J M. Contingent Valuation[A]. In: Daniel W Bromley. The Handbook of Environmental Economics[C]. US: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 1995. 629-654.
  • 5Day B, Mourato S. Willingness to pay for water quality improvements in Chinese rivers: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey in the Beijing Area[A]. In: United Nations CSERGE Working Paper 98-01,Center for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment[C]. 1998.
  • 6Arrow K, Solow R, Leamer E, et al. Report of NOAA Panel on contingent valuations[A]. In: US Federal Register[C]. 1993, 10: 4 601-4 614.
  • 7Carlsson F, Johansson-Stenman O. Willingness to pay for improved air quality in Sweden[J]. Applied Economics, 2000, 32 (6): 661-669.
  • 8钱阔 陈绍志.自然资源资产化管理[M].北京:经济管理出版社,1996..
  • 9United Nations Statistics Division, United Nations Environment Programme. Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting: An Operational Manual[M]. New York: United Nations,2000.
  • 10Holub H W, Tappeiner G, Tappeiner U. Some remarks on the "system of intergrated environmental and economic accounting" of the United Nations[J]. Ecological Economics,1999, 29:329-336.

共引文献349

同被引文献1879

引证文献128

二级引证文献1433

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部