期刊文献+

从绿蓝问题看波普尔对归纳问题的解决 被引量:1

On Popper’s Solution to the Inductive Problem from the Perspective of Grue Problem
下载PDF
导出
摘要 归纳问题是近代以来最基本的哲学问题之一。波普尔首先把归纳问题转化为假说的选择与接受问题,然后在其证伪主义范式下对其作了正面解答。波普尔的解决方案在经验层面上诉诸可证伪度标准,或者说潜在证伪者类标准,但该标准没能解决绿蓝问题。在方法论层面上,波普尔用被他拒斥的“狭隘合理性”规则来攻击归纳,从而陷入了不协调的窘境。 Inductive problem is one of the most basic modern philosophical problems. Popper transfers inductive problem into one of hypothesis choosing or holding. Then he tries to solve the hypothesis-choosing problem in his falsification paradigm. Popper's solution is to appeal to the rule of falsification degree or latent falsification set at the experience level. But the rule can’t solve the grue problem. At the methodological level, Popper attacks induction with the rule of narrow rationality that he refutes. So he plunges himself into the predicament of inconsistency.
作者 顿新国
机构地区 南京大学哲学系
出处 《安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第2期31-35,共5页 Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 绿蓝问题 归纳问题 潜在证伪者类 波普尔 grue problem inductive problem latent falsification set popper
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1休谟.人类理解研究.关文运译.北京:商务印书馆,1997.
  • 2罗素.哲学问题[M].何兆武译.北京:商务印书馆,1999.
  • 3[4]卡尔·波普尔.客观知识[M]. 上海: 上海译文出版社,2001.
  • 4[7]卡尔*波普尔.猜想与反驳[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1986.
  • 5波普尔.科学发现的逻辑[M].沈阳:沈阳出版社,1999.132-144.
  • 6[7]Nelson Goodman. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast . Harvard University, 1983.
  • 7[8]Andrew J. Swan. Popper on Induction.British Journal for Philosophy of Science.39(1988).
  • 8[9]Peter Turney. A Note on Popper's Equation of Simplicity with Falsifiability . British Journal for Philosophy of Science. 42(1991).
  • 9[10]Karl Popper. Realism and the Aim of Science . Hutchinson & Co. Ltd, 1983.

共引文献16

同被引文献14

  • 1顿新国.绿蓝问题与简单性方案[J].自然辩证法研究,2004,20(10):44-47. 被引量:4
  • 2Catherine Z.Elgin.Nelson Goodman's New Rid- dle of Induction.New York&London:Garland Publishing, INC,1997.xi.
  • 3Jean Nicod.Foundation of Geometry and Induction. London:Routledge, 1930.219.
  • 4Nelson Goodman.Fact,Fiction,and Forecast.Cambridge:Harvard University, 1983.74,83,94.
  • 5Rarm Israel.Two interpretations of" grue" - or how to misunderstand the new riddle of induction. [J] Analysis, 64.4,2004,337.
  • 6S.F.Barker & Peter Achinstein,On the New Riddle of Induction.In Nelson Goodman's New R.iddle of Induction.New York:Garland Publishing,Inc, 1997.
  • 7Joseph UUian.More on "Grue" and Grue [J]. Philosophical Review, LXLX(1960), 511.
  • 8Joseph UUian.Luck,License,and Lingo [A].In Grue! The New Riddle of Induction[C],Chicago:Open Court, 1994,37,39.
  • 9W.V.Quine.Natural Kinds [ A ] .in Grue! The New Riddle of Induction [C ], Chicago:Open Court, 1994,42,48,49.
  • 10Peter GTrdenfors.Induction,Conceptual Spac es,and AI [A].in Grue! The New Riddle of Induction, Chicago:Open Court, 1994.126,129.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部