摘要
归纳问题是近代以来最基本的哲学问题之一。波普尔首先把归纳问题转化为假说的选择与接受问题,然后在其证伪主义范式下对其作了正面解答。波普尔的解决方案在经验层面上诉诸可证伪度标准,或者说潜在证伪者类标准,但该标准没能解决绿蓝问题。在方法论层面上,波普尔用被他拒斥的“狭隘合理性”规则来攻击归纳,从而陷入了不协调的窘境。
Inductive problem is one of the most basic modern philosophical problems. Popper transfers inductive problem into one of hypothesis choosing or holding. Then he tries to solve the hypothesis-choosing problem in his falsification paradigm. Popper's solution is to appeal to the rule of falsification degree or latent falsification set at the experience level. But the rule can’t solve the grue problem. At the methodological level, Popper attacks induction with the rule of narrow rationality that he refutes. So he plunges himself into the predicament of inconsistency.
出处
《安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第2期31-35,共5页
Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
绿蓝问题
归纳问题
潜在证伪者类
波普尔
grue problem
inductive problem
latent falsification set
popper