期刊文献+

基于可变权重的电能质量模糊综合评价 被引量:180

FUZZY SYNTHETIC EVALUATION OF POWER QUALITY BASED ON CHANGEABLE WEIGHT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对电能质量进行综合评估得出的量化描述结果,可以作为用户选择供电服务的参考依据,有利于最终实现电能按质定价。作者将层次分析法(AHP)和模糊方法相结合,先通过 AHP 得到主观权值,再对得到的主观权值进行修正形成可变的综合权重;最后运用模糊综合评判对公共连接点(PCC)的电能质量进行评估,得到电能质量的等级和电能质量因子。实例计算结果表明该方法有利于区分电能质量等级及对电能质量进行定性和定量评价。 The quantified description from power quality synthetic evaluation is available for reference to the consumers in choosing the power suppliers, and it is also beneficial to fix the price according to the quality of electric energy. Combining the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with fuzzy theory, at first the subjective weights are obtained, then by means of modifying the obtained subjective weights the changeable synthetic weights are formed, at last power quality at the point of common coupling(PCC) is evaluated by fuzzy synthetic evaluation and the power quality level and the power quality factor are obtained. Case results show that the proposed method is beneficial to distinguish power quality level and to conduct the quantitative and qualitative evaluation of power quality.
出处 《电网技术》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2005年第6期11-16,共6页 Power System Technology
基金 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20040079002)。~~
关键词 供电服务 定价 模糊综合评价 权重 层次分析法(AHP) 用户 实例计算 电能质量 权值 区分 Electric power distribution Electric power factor Fuzzy control Power transmission
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1贾清泉,宋家骅,兰华,杨以涵,尹昌新.电能质量及其模糊方法评价[J].电网技术,2000,24(6):46-49. 被引量:112
  • 2肖峻,王成山,周敏.基于区间层次分析法的城市电网规划综合评判决策[J].中国电机工程学报,2004,24(4):50-57. 被引量:233
  • 3唐会智,彭建春.基于模糊理论的电能质量综合量化指标研究[J].电网技术,2003,27(12):85-88. 被引量:178
  • 4Cai Liang, Chen Hongkun. Fuzzy studies on power quality-part I:index and evaluation[A]. 10th International Conference on Harmonicsand Quality of Power[C]. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 2002, 2: 419-423.
  • 5Farghal S A, Kandil M S, Elmitwany A. Quantifying electric power quality via fuzzy modeling and analytic hierarchy processing[J]. IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 2002, 149(1 ):44-49.
  • 6Mccauley-Bell P, Badiru A. Fuzzy modeling and analytic hierarchy processing to quantify risk levels associated with occupational injuries-part I: the development of fuzzy-linguistic risk levels[J]. IEEE Trans on Fuzzy System, 1996, 4(2): 124-131.
  • 7Mccauley-Bell P, Badiru A. Fuzzy modeling and analytic hierarchy processing to quantify risk levels associated with occupational injuries-part Ⅱ: the development of fuzzy rule-based model for the prediction of injury[J]. IEEE Trans on Fuzzy System, 1996, 4(2):132-138.
  • 8Brooks D I, Dugan R C, Waclawiak Met al. Indices for assessing utility distribution system RMS variation performance[J].IEEE Traason Power Delivery, 1998, 13(1): 254-259.
  • 9黄维忠.指标权重的二阶段赋权法及其应用[J].上海海运学院学报,2003,24(2):168-170. 被引量:9

二级参考文献16

共引文献436

同被引文献1384

引证文献180

二级引证文献2102

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部