摘要
目的探讨冠心病介入术(PCI)患者家庭功能与应对方式之间的关系。方法采用家庭功能评估问卷(AP鄄GAR)、简易应对方式问卷(SCMQ)和医学应对问卷(MCSQ)对58例行冠状动脉介入术的住院患者进行自测答卷,比较家庭功能良好者(正常组)与有明显障碍者(障碍组)之间在日常应对方式和医学应对方式上的差异。结果两组患者在简易应对方式和医学应对方式上均无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论PCI患者的家庭功能状况与其日常应对方式和医学应对方式之间没有明显的相互影响,与假设相反。提示家庭功能与个体应付方式对患者可能是相对独立的影响因子,各有其作用方式与影响途径。临床工作中需从两方面分别采取心理—社会干预措施。
Objective To discuss the relationship between family function of coronary PCI patients and coping style.Methods To make a self-test questionnaire of 58 coronary PCI patients with the adoption of APGAR, SCMQ and MCSQ, to compare the difference between good family function (normal) and obstacles (barrier) on routine coping styles and medical coping modes. Results There was no obvious difference for these two groups of patients both on simple coping style and on medical coping style. Conclusion There is no obvious mutual effects for the relationship between family function of PCI and daily coping style as well as medical coping style, against the hypothesis. For the patients, it is possible that family function and individual coping style are the relative independent genes, both of them have their own function style and effect approach. It is necessary to take interfering measures of mentality-society from two aspects in the clinical task.
出处
《中国现代医药杂志》
2005年第1期48-50,共3页
Modern Medicine Journal of China