期刊文献+

内隐记忆的证明逻辑与加工分离说(PDP)的修正模型 被引量:11

LOGICS FOR DEMONSTRATION OF IMPLICIT MEMORY AND THE REVISION OF THE PROCESS DISSOCIATION PROCEDURE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 讨论了内隐记忆的证明逻辑和内隐与外显测验中的意识和无意识影响问题。间接证明内隐记忆的逻辑应用在功能分离实验中。它的前提假设是记忆测验都是"纯净"的。直接证明逻辑应用在匹配比较实验中。它认为测验中的意识和无意识影响是并存的,Jacoby等人近期提出的加工分离说(PDP)在匹配比较法的基础上,将测验中的意识和无意识影响进行了分离,并借用经典测验理论的公式计算这两种影响。作者认为,按照概率论关于两个随机独立事件之和与积的运算法则,必须把包含测验(inclusiontest)的公式修正为Inclusion=R(1-a)+A(1-R)。修正过的PDP由四个方程组成。它不仅考虑了原PDP忽视的外显条件下的无意识缺失(1-a),而且可以更加确切地估计回忆概率(R)。这在数学理论上已找到了证据。 This paper discussed two logics for demonstrating implicit memory and the problem of conscious and unconscious influences within a task.The logic of indirect demonstration was used in functional dissociation experiments,the prerequisite of which was a 'pure'assumption of conscious or unconscious influence in a test.The logic of direct demonstration was used in the matched comparison experiments,the prerequisite of which was that both conscious and unconscious influences were engaged in a test.A process-dissociation procedure was proposed based on the latter by Jacoby,however,it separated conscious and unconscious influences within a test by borrowing computations from the classic test theory.The author argued that a revised equation for inclusion test should be generated,that is,Inclusion =R(1-a) + A(1-R),thus the PDP should be revised that includes four equations.It not only considered a failure of unconscious influences(1-a)in the inclusion test that the PDP omitted, but also provided more accurate estimation of recollection (R)than that of the recollection (R0) from the PDP,which had a theoretical basis of mathematics.
作者 叶阁蔚
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 1994年第4期410-416,共7页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
关键词 心理学 内隐记忆 证明逻辑 修正 加工分离说 implicit memory,logics of demonstration,the revised process-dissociation procedure,conscious and unconscious influences.
  • 相关文献

同被引文献67

引证文献11

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部