期刊文献+

T3期胸段食管癌患者根治术后预后因素的Cox回归分析 被引量:3

The value of postoperative arterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with T3 esophageal squamous carcinoma after radical surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究T3期食管癌根治术后患者的预后因素。方法1990年1月至1999年1月间进行根治性手术的T3期胸下段食管癌患者190例,分成实验组108和对照组82例,并分为3次以下化疗组56例和3次以上化疗组52例。实验组于术后3~4周动脉灌注顺铂加5氟脲嘧啶,每4~6周1次,所有患者全部随访,选择5个可能影响预后的因素数据经统计学处理。结果动脉灌注化疗组与对照组间的远期生存率无统计学差异;即使存在淋巴结转移,经动脉灌注化疗组与对照组间比较也不延长远期生存;而3次以上动脉灌注化疗可以延长T3期食管癌根治术后的远期生存。经过COX比例风险模型分析。年龄、性别、部位等不影响患者的预后,但淋巴结转移和3次以上动脉灌注化疗是影响食管癌切除术的主要因素。结论淋巴结转移和3次以上动脉灌注化疗是影响食管癌切除术后预后的重要因素。为提高预后,应常规进行区域淋巴结清扫,并于术后进行3次以上的辅助化疗。 Objective To studying the porgnostic factors after curative esophagetomy for the thoracic segment T3 esophageal after radical surgery. Methods 190 patients suffering from T3 squamous carcinoma of lower thoracic esophagus who underwent radical surgery from January 1990 to January 1999, 158 males and 32 females, aged 62.98 (40~81), were divided into 2 groups: 108 patients (experimental group, T3N0M0 56 cases and T3N1M0 52 cases) underwent surgery and arterial infusion (cisplatin 80 mg/m2 and fluorouracil (800 mg/m2) with or without epirubicin since 3~4 weeks postoperatively, the interval of each periods is 4-6 weeks. and the other 82 patients (T3N0M0 48 cases and T3N1M0 34 cases) underwent surgery only. Fifty-six out of the 108 cases in the experimental group (T3N0M0 26 cases and T3N1M0 30 cases) underwent 3 periods of chemotherapy for less than 3 periods of chemotherapy with an interval between 2 periods of 4~6 weeks, and the other 52 patients (T3N0M0 30 cases and T3N1M0 22 cases) underwent chemotherapy for 3 periods or over. All cases were followed up for more than 5 years. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to analyze the survival rate. Cox regression model was used to analyze the influencing factors of prognosis. Results There was no significant difference in the overall long-term survival rate between the experimental group and control group, however, the survival rate of those receiving 3 periods of chemotherapy and over was significantly higher than those receiving less than 3 periods of chemotherapy Lymph node metastatic status was an important factor in prognosis of esophageal squamous carcinoma. Conclusion Without severe side effects, postoperative chemotherapy by transcatheter arterial infusion prolongs the survival rate of the patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma who have been previously treated by radical surgery.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第9期586-589,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 患者 术后 动脉灌注化疗 对照组 预后因素 远期 淋巴结转移 结论 主要因素 生存 Esophageal neoplasms Prognostic factors Cox model
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1徐同株,华燕艳,缪建华.动脉插管化疗治疗食管癌30例[J].中华医学杂志,1997,77(6):471-472. 被引量:3
  • 2张合林,平育敏,白世祥,孟宪利,何明,何清波.应用COX模型对食管癌切除术预后的研究[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2000,16(6):346-349. 被引量:12
  • 3Mariette C, Taillier G, Van Seuningen I, et al.Factors affecting postoperative course and survival after en-bloc resection for esophageal carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg,2004,78:1177-1183.
  • 4Polee MB, Hop WC, Kok TC,et al. Prognostic factors for survival in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer treated with cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. Br J Cancer,2003,89:2045-2050.
  • 5Igaki H, Kato H, Tachimori Y,et al. Prognostic evaluation of patients with clinical T1 and T2 squamous cell carcinomas of the thoracic esophagus after 3-field lymph node dissection. Surgery,2003,133:368-374.
  • 6Osugi H, Takemura M, Takada N,et al.Prognostic factors after oesophagectomy and extended lymphadenectomy for squamous oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg, 2002,89:909-913.
  • 7许运龙,郭昭扬.应用Cox模型分析影响胸段食管癌切除术预后的因素[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2001,8(3):160-162. 被引量:10
  • 8安丰山,黄金球,谢映涛,陈少湖,戎铁华.食管癌新辅助放化疗的前瞻性临床研究[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2003,25(4):376-379. 被引量:67
  • 9Malthaner RA,Wong RKS,Rumble RB,et al.Neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy for respectable esophageal cancer:a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Medicine,2004,2:35-52.
  • 10Bedard EL,Inculet RI,Malthaner RA,et al.The role of surgery and postoperative chemoradiation therapy in patients with lymph node positive esophageal squamous carcinoma.Cancer,2001,91:2423-2430.

二级参考文献11

  • 1黄国俊 汪良骏 等.食管癌外科治疗的远期结果[J].中华外科杂志,1987,25:449-449.
  • 2AJCC 曹子昂译.国际癌分期标准[M].上海:上海科学技术文献出版社,1994.61-63.
  • 3Lerut T, De Leyn P, Coosemans W, et al, Surgical strategies in esophageal carcinoma with emphasis on radical lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg, 1992, 216:583-590.
  • 4Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, et al. Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg, 1994, 220:364-373.
  • 5金丕焕,医用统计方法,1993年,309-325,387-395页
  • 6黄国俊,食管癌和贲门癌,1990年,138页
  • 7全国肿瘤防治办公室 中国抗癌协唬泄<裥灾琢稣镏喂娣?1.食管癌和贲门癌,1990年,6页
  • 8全国肿瘤防治办公室 中国抗癌协唬泄<裥灾琢稣镏喂娣?9.肿瘤诊治工作常见统计指标和统计方法,1990年,16页
  • 9邵令方,食管外科学,1987年,452页
  • 10王春利,丁悌,常林宝,赵进明,郭慧.食管癌综合治疗与单一手术治疗的比较[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2001,23(3):254-255. 被引量:22

共引文献87

同被引文献14

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部