期刊文献+

MRCP在肝外胆管梗阻中的诊断价值 被引量:18

Clinical Value of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Evaluation of Extrahepatic Biliary Obstruction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨磁共振胰胆管成像(magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, MRCP)技术在肝外胆 磁共振水成像  肝外胆管梗阻中的诊断价值。方法 收集我院2004年收治的42例胆管梗阻患者的MRCP检查临床资料,分析良、恶性肝外胆管梗阻在MRCP上的不同表现。结果 MRCP检查在30例良性梗阻患者主要表现为胆管均匀扩张及逐渐狭窄,管壁均匀增厚,断端可呈“鸟嘴样”,其在良性梗阻中的定位及定性准确率分别为100%(30/30)和97%(29/30);12例恶性梗阻患者中主要表现为胆管不均匀对称扩张及突然狭窄或截断,管壁不均匀增厚,可出现“双管截断征”,其在恶性梗阻中的定位及定性准确率分别为100%(12/12)和92%(11/12)。结论 MRCP是一种无创性显示胰胆管管腔形态学改变的影像学方法,在评价肝外胆管梗阻中具有较好的定位及定性准确率。 Objective To evaluate the clinical value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in diagnosis of extrahepatic bile duct obstruction. Methods MRCP images of 42 patients presented clinically with obstructive jaundice were retrospectively reviewed to assess the lumen morphological abnormalities of benign versus malignant bile duct obstructions, with clinical pathological correlation. Results The bile duct of the 30 cases of benign biliary obstruction presented regular and symmetric dilation, gradual tapering,regular thickening and had a “beak like” tip. The accuracy of MRCP for evaluating the site and the etiology of the benign biliary obstruction were 100%(30/30) and 97%(29/30) respectively. The bile duct of the 12 cases of malignant biliary obstruction presented irregular and asymmetric dilation,abrupt narrowing or iterruption,irregular thickening and had “dual duct sign”. The accuracy of MRCP for evaluating the site and the etiology of the malignant biliary obstruction were 100%(12/12) and 92%(11/12) respectively. Conclusion MRCP is the noninvasive technique of choice with excellent accuracy for the evaluation of obstructive biliary pathology.
出处 《中国普外基础与临床杂志》 CAS 2005年第2期188-191,共4页 Chinese Journal of Bases and Clinics In General Surgery
关键词 MRCP 肝外胆管梗阻 诊断价值 患者 恶性梗阻 良性梗阻 狭窄 定位 结论 收集 Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography Extrahepatic bile duct obstruction
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Yeh TS,Jan YY,Tseng JH,et al. Malignant perihilar biliary obstruction:magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographic findings [J]. Am J Gastroenterol,2000; 95(2):432.
  • 2Calvo MM,Bujanda L,Calderon A,et al. Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis [J]. Mayo Clin Proc,2002; 77(5):422.
  • 3Kim MJ,Mitchell DG,Ito K,et al. Biliary dilatation:differentiation of benign from malignant causesvalue of adding conventional MR imaging to MR cholangiopancreatography [J]. Radiology,2000; 214(1):173.
  • 4Reinhold C,Bret PM. Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,1996; 166(6):1285.
  • 5Laing AD,Gibson RN. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography [J]. Australas Radiol,1999; 43(3):284.
  • 6Lopez Hanninen E,Amthauer H,Hosten N,et al. Prospective evaluation of pancreatic tumors:accuracy of MR imaging with MR cholangiopancreatography and MR angiography [J]. Radiology,2002; 224(1):34.
  • 7Park MS,Kim TK,Kim KW,et al. Differentiation of extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma from benign stricture:findings at MRCP versus ERCP [J]. Radiology,2004; 233(1):234.
  • 8Kalra M,Sahani D,Ahmad A,et al. The role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected biliary obstruction [J]. Curr Gastroenterol Rep,2002; 4(2):160.
  • 9Tripathi RP,Batra A,Kaushik S. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography:evaluation in 150 patients [J]. Indian J Gastroenterol,2002; 21(3):105.
  • 10Geier A,Nguyen HN,Gartung C,Matern S. MRCP and ERCP to detect small ampullary carcinoma [J]. Lancet,2000; 356(9241):1607.

同被引文献157

引证文献18

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部