2Camellin M. LASEK may after the advantages of both LASIK and PRK. Ocu Surg N Int, 1999, 10 (3): 14-15.
3Lee JB. Comparison of laser epithelial kerahomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for low to moderate myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2001, 27 (4): 565-570.
4Scerrati E. Laser in situ keratomileusis vs. laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASIK vs.LASEK).J Refract Surg,2001,17:S219.
5Qi H,Xia Y,Chen Y,et al.Excimer retreatment for under correction or regression after laser in situ keratomilusis.Zhong Hua Yan Ke Za Zhi,2001.38(2):72-75.
6Rashad KM,Laser in situ keratomileusis retreatment for residual myopia and astigmatism,J Refract Surg,2000,16:170-176.
7Zadok D, Raifkup F, Landau D, et al. Long-term evaluation of hperopic laser in situ keratomileusis [J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003,29( 11 ) : 2181-2188.
8Stulting RD,Carr TD,Keith FR,et al.Complications of laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of myopia[J].Ophthalmology,1999,106(1):13-20.
9Gimbel HV,Penno EEA,Van Westenbrugge JA,et al.Incidence and management of intraoperative and early postoperative complications in 1000 consecutive laser in situ keratomileusis cases[J].Ophthalmology,1998,105(10):1839-1848.
10Mark BW,Steven EW.Incidence and prevention of epithelial growth within the interface after laser in situ keratomileusis[J].Cornea,2000,19(2):170-173.
