期刊文献+

GI-Ⅱ型渗透陶瓷断裂韧性测试 被引量:1

Determination of the fracture toughness of GI-Ⅱinfiltrated ceramic
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:测试并比较GI-Ⅱ型渗透陶瓷和In-ceram的断裂韧性和硬度。方法:制备GI-Ⅱ型渗透陶瓷和In-ceram圆盘形试件,研磨抛光。在维氏硬度仪上测试断裂韧性和硬度。断裂韧性数据采用Weibull分析。结果:GI-Ⅱ型渗透陶瓷和In-ceram的断裂韧性和硬度分别是3.05±0.06MN·m^(-1.5),12.66±0.33GPa和3.86±0.25MN·m^(-1.5),14.63±0.43GPa。Weibull 模数分别是46.93和15.00。结论:GI-Ⅱ型渗透陶瓷的断裂韧性和硬度比In-ceram低,但明显高于其它传统牙科陶瓷,而且其较高的Weibull模数表明其较好的材料均质性。 Objective: This study was to compare fracture toughness and hardness of GI-ⅡInfiltrated Ceramic and In-ceram using indentation method. Methods: GI-II infiltrated ceramic and In-ceram disks were fabricated and polished. Their fracture toughness and hardness were determined with Vicker's indentation test machine. The fracture toughness data was processed by Weibull analysis. Results: The fracture toughness and hardness were 3.05±0.06MN·m-1.5 and 12.66±0.33GPa for GI-ⅡInfiltrated Ceramic, 3.86±0.25MN·m-1.5 and 14.63±0.43GPa for In-ceram. The Weibull Modulus of the fracture toughness was 46.93 and 15.00, respectively.Conclusion: GI-ⅡInfiltrated Ceramic is lower in fracture toughness and hardness than In-ceram, but much higher than many other traditional dental restorative ceramics and its higher Weibull modulus indicate better homogeneity.
出处 《口腔颌面修复学杂志》 2005年第1期19-21,共3页 Chinese Journal of Prosthodontics
基金 四川省卫生厅科研基金资助项目(编号970106)
关键词 渗透陶瓷 GP 牙科陶瓷 断裂韧性 分析 制备 目的 方法 数据 抛光 dental ceramic infiltrated ceramic fracture toughness hardness
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1王航,廖运茂,巢永烈,韩晓莉,梁星.GI-II型渗透陶瓷热膨胀性能分析[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2000,1(2):101-102. 被引量:1
  • 2王航 巢永烈 廖运茂.氧化铝的不同粒度组成对GⅠ—Ⅱ型渗透陶瓷性能的影响[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2000,18:195-198.
  • 3王航,巢永烈,廖运茂,巢齐宇,高卫民.GI-Ⅱ型渗透陶瓷氧化铝粉浆粘度的测试[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2001,2(1):45-46. 被引量:3
  • 4王航,巢永烈,廖运茂,梁星,朱智敏,高卫民.GI-Ⅱ型渗透陶瓷中氧化铝坯体和烧结体的孔隙分析[J].华西医科大学学报,2001,32(2):264-266. 被引量:2
  • 5Taira M, Nomura Y, Wakasa K, et al. Studies on fracture toughness of dental ceramics[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 1990, (6):17 (6):551~563
  • 6Ressenstiel SF, Porter SS. Apparent fracture of all-ceramic crown systems[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1989, 62 (5): 529~ 532
  • 7Kvan K, Hero H, Oilo G. Fracture toughness measurements of some dental core ceramics: a methodologic study[J]. Scand J Dent Res, 1991, 99 (6):527~532
  • 8Seghi RR, Denry IL, Rosenstiel SF. Relative fracture tough ness and hardness of new dental ceramics[J]. J Prosthet Dent,1995, 74 (2): 145~152
  • 9Demy I, Seghi RR, Brajevic F. Apparent fracture toughness of new commercial dental restorative ceramics[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1991, 70:484
  • 10Wagner WC, Chu TM. Biaxial flexural strength and indenta tion fracture toughness of three new dental core ceramics[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1996, 76 (2): 140~ 144

二级参考文献14

  • 1王航 巢永烈 等.氧化铝的不同粒度组成对GI-Ⅱ型渗透陶瓷性能的影响[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2000,18:195-195.
  • 2王航,华西口腔医学杂志,2000年,18卷,增刊,195页
  • 3王航,临床口腔医学杂志,2000年,16卷,4期,223页
  • 4王航 巢永烈 廖运茂.氧化铝的不同粒度组成对GⅠ—Ⅱ型渗透陶瓷性能的影响[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2000,18:195-198.
  • 5Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics in dentistry: historical roots and current perspectives. [J]J Prosthet Dent, 1996,75:18-32
  • 6Cesarano-Ⅲ J, Aksay IA. Processing of highly concentrated aqueous α -alumina suspensions stablized with polyelectrolytes. [J]J Am Ceram Soc, 1988,71:1062-67
  • 7Lange FF.New interparicle potential paradigm for advanced powder processing, pp185-201 in Ceramic Transactions, vo/.22: Ceramic Science Ⅳ, Hirano S, Messing GL, and Hausner H, [M]American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1993.
  • 8Chou CC, Senna M.Correlation between rheological behavior of aqueous suspensionof A12o3 and properties of cast bodies: effects of dispersant and ultrafine powders. [J]Am Ceram SocBull, 1987,66:1129-33
  • 91,Kely JR, Nishimura I,Campbell SD. Ceramics indentistry: historical roots and current perspectives. [J]J Prosthet Dent 1996:75:18-32
  • 103,Wolf WD, Vaidya KJ. Mechanical Properties and failure analysis of alumina-glass dentalcomposite. [J]J Am Ceram Soc 1996:77:1769-76

共引文献4

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部