期刊文献+

18世纪汉学书院与科举关系新论

On the Relationship Between the Study of Chinese Classics and the Imperial Examinations System in the 18th Century
下载PDF
导出
摘要 18世纪中叶出现的乾嘉学派以书院作为汉学研究和传播的基地。由于汉学家执掌的书院与直接为科举考试服务的考课式书院有显著的差异,造成了汉学书院不为培养科举人才服务的假象。其实,汉学家主持的书院不仅在山长的延聘上注重科甲出身,而且其教学活动也不排斥科举之学,能满足生徒获取科场应试知识的需求。因此,汉学书院与科举的关系十分密切。 With the Qianlong (1736-1799) and Jiaqing(1796-1819) School of Thoughts becoming prevalent the Chinese classics were studied and taught in academies. Because of the differences between those academies and the imperial examination oriented schools, some people figured that scholars of Qianlong and Jiaqing School were against imperial examination system. In fact, they not only attached importance to the grades resulted from the imperial examination in appointing the leading scholars, but also advocated stereotyped writing to meet the need of imperial examination. There is a close relation between this School and the imperial examination system.
作者 李兵
出处 《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第2期20-25,72,共7页 Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
基金 全国教育规划"十五"规划课题(EAB030508)
关键词 汉学书院 科举教学 乾嘉学派 academies of Chinese classical learning, imperial examination oriented teaching, study of relations
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1盛朗西.中国书院制度[M].台北:华世出版社,1979..
  • 2陈东原.中国教育史[M].台北:商务印书馆,1982..
  • 3李国钧.清代考据学派的最高学府——诂经精舍与学海堂.岳麓书院通讯,1983,(1).
  • 4李国钧 王炳照.中国书院史[M].长沙:湖南教育出版社,1996..
  • 5赵尔巽.清史稿[M].北京:中华书局,2003..
  • 6张仲礼.中国绅士的收入[M].上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2002..
  • 7柳诒徵.卢抱经年谱.南京:中央大学国学图书馆第一年刊,1928,.
  • 8杨绳武.钟山书院碑记[A]..(江苏)上元县志:卷23[Z].,清道光四年刊本..
  • 9卢文诏.抱经堂文集:卷18[M]..续修四库全书:1432册[C].上海:上海古籍出版社,2003..
  • 10.钦定大清会典事例:卷395[M]..续修四库全书:804册[C].上海:上海古籍出版社,2003..

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部