EPQ用电脑与纸笔实施的结果比较

Comparing the Computer and Paper-and-Pencil Administrations of the Chinese Version of EPQ

目的 :检验EPQ电脑与纸笔测试方式的等值性和优劣。方法 :以 78名大学一、二年级学生为研究对象 ,采用实验法对先电脑后纸笔 (A/B组 )和先纸笔后电脑 (B/A组 )的测试方式及施测顺序进行研究 ,并对学生对两种测试的主观感受进行调查。结果 :A/B组各分量表的相关为 0 467～ 0 844 ,B/A组各分量表的相关为 0 5 67～ 0 870 ,测试方式之间的相关为 0 64 6～ 0 85 6,测试顺序之间的相关为 0 0 48～ 0 14 3 ,在E、N分量表上的顺序差异有统计学显著性。在十个问题的回答上有九个差异有统计学显著性。结论 :电脑和纸笔两种测试方式基本是等值的 ,纸笔测试更具人文性和可接受性。

Objective:To verify equivalence of the Computer and Paper-and-Pencil Administrations the Chinese version of EPQ. Method:The Chinese Version of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire was administered twice at an interval of 7 day to 78 college students of the A/B and B/A groups.Results:On the P,E,N,and L scales,the A/B group correlation between the computer and booklet ranged from 0.47 to 0.84,the B/A group ranged from 0.57 to 0.87,the administration modes ranged from 0.65 to 0.8,the administration orders ranged from 0.05 to 0.14.Conclusion:The computer and booklet administration mode of the EPQ was equivalence,but the later is more humanistic.