期刊文献+

肿瘤标志物联合检测晚期肺癌的临床意义 被引量:4

The significance of combined assays of serum tumor marker in advanced lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨肿瘤相关物质(TSGF)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、癌抗原125(CA125)、细胞角蛋白19(CY21- 1)联合检测在晚期肺癌诊断中的临床意义。方法:采集85例有肺部疾病的患者血清,用化学发光法检测其血清TSGF、CEA、CA125、CY21- 1 的含量。结果:肺癌患者血清TSGF、CEA、CA125、CY21 -1 的阳性率分别为73. 24%、83.09%、53.52%和61.97%,均明显高于肺部良性病变组(P<0.01)。4种肿瘤标记物单项在晚期肺癌中的灵敏度、特异度的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。血清CEA和CY21 1联合检测鳞癌的阳性率为76%,与腺癌阳性率(83.78%)的差异无统计学意义(P > 0. 05)。CEA 联合CA125 检测腺癌的阳性率为94. 59%,高于鳞癌的84.00%及肿瘤标志物单项对腺癌的阳性检出率(P < 0. 05)。结论:血清肿瘤标志物TSGF、CEA、CA125 和CY21 -1联合检测可提高肺癌的诊断阳性率,建议联合检测方式为CEA+CA125。 Objective: To study the clinical significance of tumor marker with combined assaying in the diagnosis. Methods: Serum samples were collected from 85 in-patients. The concentrations of serum TSGF, CEA, CA125 and CY21-1 were determined by chemiluminescence. Results:In lung cancer group, the total positive rates of TSGF, CEA, CA125 and CY21-1 are 73.24%,83.09%,53,52%,61.97% respectively, which were significantly higher than that in benign lung disease group(P<0.01). There was no significant difference of serum single tumor marker sensitivity and specificity in advanced lung cancer(P> 0.05). The sensitivity of combined assay with serum CEA+CY21-1 in diagnosing squamous cell carcinoma was 76%, adenocarcinoma was 83.78%. No significant difference of serum CEA+CY21-1 sensitivity between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma(P>0.05).The sensitivity of combined assay with serum CEA+CA125 in diagnosing adenocarcinoma was 94.59%,which was significantly higher than that in squamous cell carcinoma (84%) and the sensitivity of single tumor marker in adenocarcinoma(P<0.05). Conclusion: The sensitivity in diagnosis lung cancer is raised by combined assaying with TSGF, CEA, CA125 and CY21-1. It is suggested that combined assay with CEA+CA125 would be better.
出处 《新疆医科大学学报》 CAS 2005年第3期244-246,共3页 Journal of Xinjiang Medical University
关键词 晚期肺癌 肿瘤相关物质 癌胚抗原 癌抗原125 细胞角蛋白19 advanced lung cancer TSGF CEA CA125 CY21-1
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献31

  • 1钱小顺,杨德昌,何积银.血清和支气管肺泡灌洗液中神经元特异性烯醇酶对小细胞肺癌的诊断价值[J].陕西医学杂志,1996,25(4):234-237. 被引量:4
  • 2王自正,陆雪龙,付雷,宋庆芳,陶惠云.非小细胞肺癌标志物CYFRA21-1的临床研究[J].中华核医学杂志,1996,16(3):200-201. 被引量:9
  • 3李蓉,李睿.肺癌肿瘤标记物研究进展[J].国外医学(肿瘤学分册),1996,23(2):98-103. 被引量:29
  • 4徐元斌 王德春 等.恶性肿瘤特异性生长因子(TSGF)测定及临床应用[J].福建医学检验,1996,1(3):118-118.
  • 5柏华 丁康生.血清肿瘤标志物对肺癌的诊断价值[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1995,17(1):23-23.
  • 6陈遂康 等.肺癌标志物的研究--血清唾液酸测定与肺癌诊断以及含量变化机量的初探[J].中华医学杂志,1981,61(2):65-65.
  • 7[1]Fuhrman C, Duche JC, Chouaid C, et al. Use of tumor markers for differential diagnosis of mesothelioma and secondary pleural malignancies. Clin Biochem,2000,33(5):405-410.
  • 8[2]Alatas F, Alatas O, Metintas M, et al. Diagnostic value of CEA, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, CYFRA 21-1, NSE and TSA assay in pleural effusions. Lung Cancer,2001,31(1):9-16.
  • 9[3]Miedouge M, Rouzaud P, Salama G, et al. Evaluation of seven tumor markers in pleural fluid for the diagnosis of malignant effusions. Br J Cancer,1999,81(6):1059-1065.
  • 10[4]Ando S, Kimura H, Iwai N, et al. Optimal combination of seven tumor markers in prediction of advanced stage at first examination of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res,2001,21(4B):3085-3092.

共引文献215

同被引文献40

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部