仲裁的司法监督:过度干预和控制还是适度监督

Judicial Supervision over Arbitration:Excessive Intervention and Control or Appropriate Supervision

对仲裁的司法监督是现代各国的通例。但依何标准对仲裁实施监督,各国的法律规定及法院的态度又有很大的不同。在我国,理论界对仲裁的监督问题众说纷纭,各地法院对仲裁的监督标准也不尽一致。本文认为,对仲裁的监督应限于审查是否合法以及是否存在其他可能影响公正裁决的程序因素,并以适度监督为原则。

Judicial Supervision Over Arbitration has been the customary practice in each country of the modern world,but sharp variation exists in the legal stipulations and the courts’ attitude toward the standard to be applied in the supervision over arbitration.In China,there has always been a controversy over judicial supervision and the standards applied in the supervision over arbitration by courts in different regions are less than identical. It is asserted in this thesis that judicial supervision over arbitraton should be retricted to the investigation of the legality of arbitration and whether there exist other procedural factors that may affect impartial arbitration. Judicial supervision over arbitration should be moderate.