摘要
目的:评价复方对乙酰氨基酚治疗由感冒引起的发热疼痛的效果及安全性.方法:随机双盲双模拟对照研究.入选139例,完成135例,其中A组(试验组n=68)服用复方对乙酰氨基酚胶囊+模拟片;B组(对照组n=67)服用对乙酰氨基酚片+模拟胶囊.2组按入组顺序服药,每日3次,疗程均为3~5 d.观察2组疗效和不良反应.结果:试验组痊愈率为74%,有效率达96%,对照组痊愈率为69%,有效率达91%(P>0.05),对发热和头痛的临床症状2组均有改善,试验组68例发热病人中有97%病人恢复正常,62例头痛病人有95%的病人恢复正常;对照组65例发热病人和头痛病人分别有92%和91%恢复正常.试验组不良反应发生率为2%(1/68),对照组为3%(2/67)(P>0.05).未出现严重及预料之外的不良反应.结论:复方对乙酰氨基酚对治疗感冒具有明显的效果.2药的疗效相仿,无明显不良反应.
AIM: To evaluate the effect and safety of compound acetaminophen capsule in treating symptoms of fever and pain caused by common cold. METHODS: Randomized double blind control clinical trial was used. One hundred and thirty-nine patients were enrolled with 135 of them passing the trial and dividing into A and B groups. A group (trial group n=68) took compound acetaminophen capsule and placebo tablet. B group (control group n=67) took acetaminophen tablet and placebo capsule. Each patient took medicine according to the sequence after joining the group. The medicine was given 3 times every day for 3-5 d. The effect, safety and adverse reactions were observed between the two groups. RESULTS: The effect was analysed. The cured rates and effective rates were 74 % and 96 % for trial group; and 69 % and 91 % for control group, respectively. The effect of trial group was higher than control group(P>0.05). The clinical symptoms of fever and headache were improved including 68 fever patients (97 %) and 62 headache patients (95 %) in trial group; 65 fever(92 %) and 91 % headache patients in control group. The adverse reaction rates were 2 %(1/68) in trial group and 3 %(2/67) in control group (P>0.05). No serious adverse reactions occured. CONCLUSION: Compound acetaminophen capsule in treating common cold is effective. The effect in trial group is higher or similar to control group without any obvious adverse reactions.
出处
《中国新药与临床杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2005年第4期299-301,共3页
Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies
关键词
药物评价
醋氨酚
甲硫氨酸
感冒
随
机对照试验
双盲法
drug evaluation
acetaminophen
methionine
common cold
randomized controlled trails
double-blind method