期刊文献+

对我国《消费者权益保护法》第49条的若干思考 被引量:4

Consider the Forty-ninth Item of Consumer Protection Law in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章首先论述了我国《消费者权益保护法》第 4 9条适用的实体条件 ,然后分析了第 4 9条适用的范围 ,最后指出了第 4 9条的赔偿范围。 The article firstly discusses the applicable conditions of the forty-ninth item in China's Consumer Protection Law, secondly analyzes its scope of application and at last points out its scope of compensation.
作者 郭龙
出处 《甘肃政法学院学报》 CSSCI 2005年第2期88-91,共4页 Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute
关键词 《消费者权益保护法》 第49条 若干思考 赔偿范围 适用 forty-ninth item of consumer protection law condition of application scope of application scope of compensation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献40

  • 1Note, "Exemplary Damages in the Law of Torts", 70 Harv. L. Rev. 517, 517 (1957), and Huckle v.Money, 95 Eng. Rep. 768 (K. B. 1763).
  • 2Malzof V. United Statea, I 12 S. Ct. 711, 715 (1992).
  • 3Ernet C. Stiefel: "U. S. Punitive Damage Awards in Germany" , 39 The American Journal of Comparative Law, 1991, p. 784.
  • 4TimothyJ. Phillips ,"The Punitive Dawage Class Action: A Solution to the problem of Multiple punishment" ,1984 U. Ill. L. Rev. 153.
  • 5David R. Levy, Note, "Punitive Damages in Light of TXO Productions Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp",39 St. Louis U, L. J. 409, 412 n. 20 (1994).
  • 6Ausness, Retribution and Deterrence : The Role of Punitive Damages in Products Liability Litation , 74 K y.L. J. 1,2 (1985).
  • 7Coryell v. Colbaugh, 1 N. J. L. 90, 91 (Sup. Ct. 1791).
  • 8Wils. K. B. 20.5, 9.5 Eng, Rep. 768 (C. P. 1763).
  • 9Genayv. Norris, IS. C. L. 3, 1 Bay 6 (1784).
  • 10David Owen, "Punative Damage in Products Liability Litigation", 74 Mich. L. Rev. 1257 (1976).

共引文献903

同被引文献12

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部