摘要
在这篇论文里,我们主要通过一些汉语例证对题元理论中的题元准则所论述的论元与题元角色之间的关系作了一点探讨。通过这些具体的例证所反映出来的问题我们得出结论:题元理论并非适合所有的汉语句子;题元理论过于严格,以致一些合乎语法的句子也被排除在外,为了解释这些句子存在的合法性。
This paper gives a little touch on the relationship between arguments and theta-roles assigned to them specified by the theta criterion by way of examining some Chinese examples.Through the discussion on the application of the theta criterion to these Chinese examples and the problems arisen,a conclusion is drawn that theta criterion doesn't necessarily apply to all the Chinese sentences for it is much too rigid so as to exclude some grammatical sentences.Consequently,it is quite necessary to take a new look at theta criterion.
出处
《安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版)》
2005年第2期131-133,共3页
Journal of Anhui Agricultural University:SOC.SCI.