期刊文献+

“公正补偿”与征收权的宪法限制 被引量:115

“公正补偿”与征收权的宪法限制
原文传递
导出
摘要 对土地和财产征收的公正补偿具有重要的理论与现实意义。从公共选择理论的视角讨论了美国联邦宪法规定征收必须给予“公正补偿”的理由 ,解释了美国法院通过判例确定“公正补偿”的计算标准 ,探讨了中国宪法修正案的补偿条款之解释。宪法修正案所要求的征收“补偿”必须是体现被征收财产市场公平价值的“公正补偿” ,且这项宪法要求必须在操作过程中获得立法与司法制度的适当保障。 There is theoretical and practical significance in the just compensation for the expropriation of land and properties. From the viewpoint of public choice theory, the reason, why American constitution prescribes private property should not be expropriated without just compensation, is given. American court established the calculational standard of just compensation. The amendment of China constitution about compensation is explained. The compensation must be just that embbodied the equitable market value of the property expropriated. Legislation and judicature must safeguard the application of the amendment. Otherwise, unjust compensation would give rise to serious consequences, which aggravate social conflicts and waste resources, etc.
作者 张千帆
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第2期25-37,共13页 Chinese Journal of Law
  • 相关文献

参考文献52

  • 1Matthew C. Porterfield International Expropriation Rules and Federalism,23 Stanford Environmental Law Journal 3 (2004).
  • 2Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency,535 U.S. 302 (2002).
  • 3Matthew P. Harrington, "Public Use" and the Original Understanding of the So- Called "Takings" Clause, 53 Hastings Law Journal 1245.
  • 4Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon, 260 U.S. 393 (1922).
  • 5Frank 1. Michelman, Property, Utility, and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of "Just Compensation" Law, 80 Harvard Law Review 1165 (1967).
  • 6Michael A. Heller and James E. Krier, Deterrence and Distribution in the Law of Takings, 112 Harvard Law Review 997(1999), at 999.
  • 7Louis Kaplow, An Economic Analysis of Legal Transitions, 99 Harvard Law Review 509, 528 - 532 ( 1986 ).
  • 8Thomas W. Merrill, Incomplete Compensation for Takings, 11 N. Y. U. Environmental Law Journal I10 (2002), at 133 -134.
  • 9Henry A. Span, Public Choice Theory and Political Utility of the Takings Clause, 40 Idaho Law Review 11 ( 2003 ), at 77- 78.
  • 10John Hart Ely, Democracy and Distrust : A Theory of Judicial Review, Cambridge: Harvard University Press (1980), at 152- 153.

共引文献66

同被引文献1524

引证文献115

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部