3Stavridakis MM, Favez V, Campos EA, et al. Marginal integrity of pit and fissure sealants. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the marginal adaptation before and after in vitro thermal and mechanical stressing. Oper Dent, 2003, 28: 403-414.
4Kakaboura A, Matthaiou L, Papagiannoulis L. In vitro study of penetration of flowable resin composite and compomer into occlusal fissures. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 2002, 3: 205-209.
5Poulsen S, Beiruti N, Sadat N. A comparison of retention and the effect on caries of fissure sealing with a glass-ionomer and a resin-based sealant. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 2001,29: 298-301.
6Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM. Occlusal caries formation in vitro:comparison of resin-modified glass ionomer with fluoride-releasing sealant. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2000, 24: 309-314.
7Wu CH, Smales RJ. Occlusal wear of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement following three surface treatments. Clin Oral Investig, 2001, 5: 26-30.
8Geiger SB, Gulayev S, Weiss EI. Improving fissure sealant quality:mechanical preparation and filling level. J Dent, 2000,28: 407-412.
9Hatibovic-Kofman S, Butler SA, Sadek H. Microleakage of three sealants following conventional, bur, and air-abrasion preparation of pits and fissures. Int J Paediatr Dent, 2001,11: 409-416.
10Zervou C, Kugel G, Leone C, et al. Enameloplasty effects on microleakage of pit and fissure sealants under load: an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2000, 24: 279-285.
