期刊文献+

经尿道双极等离子电切除术治疗23例良性前列腺增生

23 cases of hyperplastic prostate with the bipolar plasmakinetic technique
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [背景]探讨经尿道双极等离子电切除术治疗良性前列腺增生的安全性和有效性.[病例报告]采用经尿道双极等离子电切除术治疗良性前列腺增生23例,其平均手术时间为50min,所切除前列腺组织的平均重量为355g,术后所有患者均未发生经尿道电切除综合征.随访第15,30,45日时,患者的最大尿流量由术前的52mL/s±38mL/s分别提高为204mL/s±42mL/s,225mL/s±43mL/s,213mL/s±41mL/s;国际前列腺症状评分由术前的251分别降低为63,64,53;生活质量评分由术前的55分别下降为16,18,15;以上指标手术前后相比较均有显著性差异.[讨论]经尿道双极等离子电切除术治疗前列腺增生安全且有效. BACKGROUND?To assess the efficacy and safety of transurethral resection of hyperplastic prostate (PKRP) with plasmakinetic energy.?CASE REPORTS?23 cases of symptomatic BHP were treated by PKRP, and the duration of the procedure was 50?min, and the average weight of prostate that been removing was 35.5?g.The transurethral resection syndrom was not occurred. All cases were followed up after operation for 15~45 days. The peak flow rate increased from 5.2?mL/s±3.8?mL/s to 20.4?mL/s±4.2?mL/s, 22.5?mL/s±4.3?mL/s, 21.3?mL/s±4.1?mL/s at 15, 30 45?d, respectivery. The IPSS decreased from 25.1 to 6.3, 6.4, 5.3;and QOL decreased from 5.5 to 1.6, 1.8, 1.5. No adductor reflex was found in all the patients.?~DISCUSSION ?The transurerhral biolar plasmakinetic resection of hyperplastic prostate is effective and safe.
出处 《延边大学医学学报》 CAS 2005年第1期67-69,共3页 Journal of Medical Science Yanbian University
关键词 前列腺肥大 手术 外科 尿道 prostatic hypertrophy surgery, operative urinary tract
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献9

  • 1[1]Mcbust W K,Holtgrewe H L,Cockett A T K,et al.Transurethral prostatectomy; Immediate and postoper ative complications. Axooperative study of thirteen par ticipating institution evaluating 3885 patients . J Urol,1989,141: 243- 247.
  • 2[2]Evans J, Singer M,Coppinger S, et al. Cardiovascular performance and core temperature during transurethral prostatectomy. J Urol, 1994,152,2025 2028.
  • 3[3]Freedman M, van Molen S W, Makings E. Blood loss measurement during transurethral resection of the prostate gland. Br J Uro1,1985,57:311-314.
  • 4[4]Ekengren J ,Hahn R G. Blood loss during transurethral resection of the prostate as measured by the hemochrome photometer. J Urol, 1993,42: 501 - 505.
  • 5[5]Narayan P,Tewari A, Croker, et al. Factors affecting sizes and configuration of electrovaporization lesions ing th the prostate. J Uro1,1996,47:679-683.
  • 6[6]Elengren J, Hmhn R G. Complications during transurethral aporization. Urology, 1996,48: 424- 427.
  • 7[7]Henry B,Barre P. Electro-vaporisation of the prostate with the gyrus device. Eur Urol, 2000,37 (Suppl 2): 1 -175.
  • 8[8]Virdi,Faiyaz K, Ponnambalam Chandrasekar, et al. A prospectiverandomised study between transurethral va porisation using plasmakinetic energy. J Urol , 163(Suppl) :268-271.
  • 9[9]Lefaucheur J P, Yiou R,Salomon L,et al. Abbou-CC assessment of penile small nerve fiber damage after transurethral resection of the prostate by measurement of penile thermal sensation. J Urol,2000, 164: 1416-1419.

共引文献273

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部