期刊文献+

A logical foundation for the semantic Web 被引量:27

A logical foundation for the semantic Web
原文传递
导出
摘要 The current research progresses and problems of the semantic Web are analyzed in this paper, and the insufficiency of using description logic to act as logical foundation for the semantic Web is analyzed too. According to the characteristics and requirement of the semantic Web, a kind of new dynamic description logic (DDL) framework is presented. The representation and reasoning of static knowledge and dynamic knowledge are integrated in this framework. Especially, a kind of action description method is proposed, and according to description logic theory, the action semantics is described, so DDL is a kind of formal logical framework which can process static knowledge and dynamic knowledge. The DDL has clear and formally defined semantics. It provides decidable reasoning services, and it can support effective representation and reasoning of the static knowledge, dynamic process and running mechanism (realization and subsumption relation of action). Therefore, the DDL provides reasonable logic foundation for the semantic Web, and overcomes the insufficiency of using description logic to act as logical foundation for the semantic Web.
出处 《Science in China(Series F)》 2005年第2期161-178,共18页 中国科学(F辑英文版)
基金 This work was supported by the 863 High Tech Programme(Grant No.2001AA113121) the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.90104021).
关键词 semantic Web description logic dynamic description logic logical foundation. semantic Web, description logic, dynamic description logic, logical foundation.
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献11

  • 1Baader F, et al. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory,Implementation and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  • 2Brachman R J, Schmolze J G. An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science, 1985, 9(2): 171-216.
  • 3Schmidt-Schauβ M, Smolka G. Attributive concept descriptions with complements. Artificial Intelligence, 1991, 48(1) : 1-26.
  • 4Reiter R. A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence,1980, 13(1): 81-132.
  • 5McCarthy J. Circumscription-A form of non-monotonic reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 1980, 13(1): 27-39.
  • 6Brewka G. Nonmonotonic Reasoning- Logical Foundations of Commonsense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
  • 7Baader F, Hullunder B. Embedding defaults into terminological representation systems. Journal of Automated Reasoning,1995, 14(1): 149-180.
  • 8Baader F, Hollunder B. Priorities on defaults with prerequisites, and their application in treating specificity in terminological default logic. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 1995, 15(1): 41-68.
  • 9Haarslev V, Moeller R, Turhan A Y, Wessel M. On terminological default reasoning about spatial information: Extended abstract. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Description Logics (DL' 99), Linkoping, Sweden, 1999. 155-159.
  • 10Lambrix P, Shahmehri N, Wahlloef N. A default extension to description logics for use in an intelligent search engine. In:Proceedings of the 31st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Volume V - Modeling Technologies and Intelligent Systems Track, Hawaii, 1998. 28-35.

共引文献51

同被引文献113

引证文献27

二级引证文献200

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部