期刊文献+

模拟情境中工作团队成员互动过程的初步研究及其测量 被引量:26

PROCESS OF INTERACTION AMONG MEMBERS IN SIMULATED WORK TEAMS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 团队已经成为当今许多组织中的主要工作方式。已有文献虽然表明工作团队成员之间的互动对于团队工作绩效有显著的影响,但却缺乏测量团队成员互动的量表。本研究在了解影响团队绩效的互动因素的基础上,编制出一个测量工作团队互动过程的量表。该测验将团队互动分为结构和人际两个维度,分别包括五个和四个题目。测验具有很好的信度和效度,符合心理测量学的标准,可用作测量团队互动的工具。 Work teams have been widely adopted in organizations. The objective of this study is to develop a scale measuring the interaction among the members of work teams. A simulated team exercise was used in this study. It was found that the items concerning the team members' interaction are loaded on two dimensions that are named structural and interpersonal dimensions respectively. The scale has satisfactory reliability. The two dimensions positively correlate with the performance of the investigated work teams, indicating the scale's strong validity. The developed scale can be used as an instrument to measure the interaction of work-teams in future studies.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2005年第2期253-259,共7页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 北京大学光华管理学院发展基金资助
关键词 工作团队 互动过程 量表 信度 效度 团队绩效 work team, interaction, scale, reliability, validity, team performance.
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1魏刚.高级管理层激励与上市公司经营绩效[J].经济研究,2000,35(3):32-39. 被引量:1642
  • 2Hackman J R The design of work teams. In: J W Lorsch ed.Handbook of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall, 1987.
  • 3Ancona D G. Outward bound: Strategies for team survival in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 1990, 33:334- 365.
  • 4Larson C E, LaFasto F. M. Teamwork: What must go right/what can go wrong. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1989.
  • 5Shepperd J A. Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 1993, 113 : 67 - 81.
  • 6Marks M A, Mathieu J E, Zaccaro S. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review,2001, 26:356 -376.
  • 7Siegel A 1, Federman, P J. A simulator study of the interaction of pilot workload with errors, vigilance, and decision. Moffett Field,CA.. NASA-Ames Research Center, 1973.
  • 8Helmreich R L. Cockpit management attitude. Human Factor,1984, 26:583 -589.
  • 9Helmreich R L, Foushee H C. Why crew resource management?Empirical and theoretical bases of human factors training in America. In: E L Wiener, B G Kanki, R L Helmreich ( Eds. ),Cockpit resource managemenL San Diego, CA: Academic Press,1993. 3-41.
  • 10Brannick M T, Roach R M, Salas E. Understanding team performance: A multimethod study. Human Performance, 1993,6:287 - 308.

同被引文献558

引证文献26

二级引证文献261

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部