期刊文献+

地被菊花幼苗耐旱性评价方法研究 被引量:50

A Simple Method to Evaluate the Drought Tolerance of Ground-Cover Chrysanthemum(Dentranthema×grandiflorum) Rooted Cuttings
下载PDF
导出
摘要 选用地被菊品种White Snow 10 叶龄扦插生根幼苗进行自然失水胁迫和PEG 胁迫处理。划分了不同处理萎蔫指数,测定了鲜样质量保持率、叶片水势、叶片溶质渗透势、丙二醛(MDA)含量、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性。结果表明,萎蔫指数划分的主要形态特征因胁迫方法而异。自然失水胁迫8 h 为幼苗恢复极限;在恢复极限内复水,幼苗鲜样质量保持率、叶片水势、MDA 含量和SOD 以及CAT 活性的变化规律显著。20%PEG 胁迫4 h 为恢复极限;复水期间的鲜样质量保持率、叶片溶质渗透势、MDA 含量和SOD 活性的变化规律显著。综合上述,这2 种方法都可以用于地被菊花幼苗耐旱性快速评价;不同的胁迫处理方式可利用的水分状况和生理指标存在一定的差异。 This experiment was conducted with rooted cuttings of ground-cover chrysanthemum, Dentranthema×grandiflorum White Snow. The 10-leaf cuttings were exposed to dehydrations in air and osmotic adjustments of PEG, respectively. With the prerequisite of determination of wilting index (WI), fresh weight retention rate (FWRR), leaf water potential (LWP), leaf solute osmotic potential (LSOP), malondialdehyde (MDA) content, the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) were measured. The main morphological characteristics to describe WI differed in both treatments. When the duration of dehydrations in air was less than 8 h, the cuttings could be recovered in 1/2 Hoagland and Arnon solutions, during which, the changes of FWRR, LWP, MDA content, SOD and CAT activity were related to drought tolerance of the cuttings. With 20% PEG treatment, the cuttings could be recovered normally in the recovery solution within 4 h stress, and the changes of FWRR, LSOP, MDA content, and SOD activity were related to drought tolerance. The above results suggested that both dehydrations in air and osmotic adjustments of PEG could be used to evaluate simply the drought tolerance of White Snow, and it differed in their available indices of water relations and physiology.
出处 《中国农业科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第4期789-796,共8页 Scientia Agricultura Sinica
基金 国家转基因植物研究与产业化开发专项资助项目(JY03-B-29) 农业部"948"引进资助项目(2003-Z45)
关键词 地被菊花 幼苗 耐旱性 评价方法 叶片水势 叶片溶质渗透势 丙二醛 超氧化物歧化酶 过氧化氢酶 Ground-cover chrysanthemum (Dentranthema×grandiflorum) Drought tolerance Index Evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1孙彩霞,沈秀瑛.作物抗旱性鉴定指标及数量分析方法的研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2002,18(1):49-51. 被引量:132
  • 2陈立松,刘星辉.作物抗旱鉴定指标的种类及其综合评价[J].福建农业大学学报,1997,26(1):48-55. 被引量:105
  • 3Karamanos A J. Ways of detecting adaptive responses of cultivated plants to drought. In: Margaris N S. eds. Being Alive on Land. Tasks for Vegetation Science. Hague: 1984: 91-101.
  • 4Maiti R K, Singh V P, Arreola E S, Chirino Y S U. Physiological, biochemical and molecular mechanisms of resistance of Phaseolus bean and other related crops to drought, high and low temperature and salinity: Review. Crop Research, 2002, 24(2): 205-241.
  • 5Islam M S, Srivastava P S L, Deshmukh P S.Evaluation of screening techniques for drought tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 1998, 3(3): 197-200.
  • 6Grzesiak S, Grzesiak M T, Filek W, Stabryla J. Evaluation of physiological screening tests for breeding drought resistant triticale (Triticosecale wittmack). Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2003, 25(1): 29-37.
  • 7Olsovska K, Brestic M. Function of hydraulic and chemical water stress signalization in evaluation of drought resistance of juvenile plants. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 2001, 2(3/4): 157-164.
  • 8Bolanos J, Edmeades G O, Martinez L. Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. III. Responses in drought-adaptive physiological and morphological traits. Field Crops Research, 1993, 31(3/4): 269-286.
  • 9Okonkwo C A C, Onoenyi F I. Morphological characters as indicators of drought resistance in diverse sorghum varieties in the scrub savannah, Nigeria. Tropical Agriculture, 1998, 75(4): 440-444.
  • 10Kumar A, Singh D P. Use of physiological indices as a screening technique for drought tolerance in oilseed brassica species. Annals of Botany, 1998, 81: 413-420.

二级参考文献77

共引文献259

同被引文献748

引证文献50

二级引证文献479

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部