摘要
Three feedforward (FFD) control techniques for position-servo machine axesare compared. All three FFD controllers are used with two different PID feedback (FBK) controllers.The two different FBK controllers have two different closed-loop bandwidths. They are demonstratedusing experimental data from a linear motor test system and from simulations. Laboratory resultsusing the linear motor hardware demonstrate that the velocity & acceleration (V&A) FFD controllerimproves tracking in all case considered, while the other two FFD controllers actually degradeperformance in many cases. Through simulation this degradation is attributed to extreme sensitivityto round off errors. This sensitivity is the result of a complex controller that is implementedoutside of the feedback loop.
Three feedforward (FFD) control techniques for position-servo machine axesare compared. All three FFD controllers are used with two different PID feedback (FBK) controllers.The two different FBK controllers have two different closed-loop bandwidths. They are demonstratedusing experimental data from a linear motor test system and from simulations. Laboratory resultsusing the linear motor hardware demonstrate that the velocity & acceleration (V&A) FFD controllerimproves tracking in all case considered, while the other two FFD controllers actually degradeperformance in many cases. Through simulation this degradation is attributed to extreme sensitivityto round off errors. This sensitivity is the result of a complex controller that is implementedoutside of the feedback loop.
基金
This project is supported by United State's National Science Foundation (No.997761).
