期刊文献+

西尼地平片治疗轻中度高血压的有效性和安全性 被引量:7

Efficacy and safety of cilnidipine tablet in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价西尼地平治疗轻中度原发性高血压的有效性和安全性。方法用随机双盲对照试验设计,入选病人共48例,西尼地平(试验组)24例,氨氯地平(对照组)24例。结果与治疗前相比,治疗8周后试验组收缩压和舒张压分别下降19.26和14.68mmHg(P<0.01),对照组分别下降为18.22和12.91mmHg(P<0.01),均有统计学意义。试验组和对照组药物不良反应的例数分别为0和2例,2组比较无统计学差异(P>0.05),均无严重不良反应发生。结论西尼地平片每日服用1次,降低血压,安全有效。 Objective To study the efficacy and safety of cilnidipine in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. Mehods Randomized, double blind, double modelling controlled clinical trial was conducted. Forty eignt patients were enrolled in the study, of which 24 patients in the cilnidipine group, 24 patients in the amlodipine group. Results After 8 weeks treatment, systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased 19.26 and 14.68 mmHg(P<0.01) in cilnidipine group, 18.22 and 12.91 mmHg in amlodipine group (P<0.01), all of them have statistical significance. No serious adverse reaction occurred. The adverse reaction in cilnidipine and amlodipine group are 0 and 2 cases (P>0.05). Conclusion Cilnidipine once daily can remarkably reduce blood pressure, no obvious adverse drug reaction occurred.
出处 《中国临床药理学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第1期8-10,共3页 The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
关键词 高血压 西尼地平片 氨氯地平片 hypertension cilnidipine tablet amlodipine tablet
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献11

  • 1Favaloro RG.Saphenous vein autograft replacement of severe segmental coronary artery occlusion: operative technique[].Annals of Thoracic Surgery The.1968
  • 2Kolessov V I.Mammary-artery-coronary artery anastomosis as method of treatment for angina pectoris[].Journal of Thoracic Imaging.1967
  • 3Gruentzig A R.Transluminal dilatation of coronary artery stenosis[].The Lancet.1978
  • 4Mark D B,Nelson C L,Califf R M,et al.Continuing evolution of therapy for coronary artery disease.Initial results from the era of coronary angioplasty[].Circulation.1994
  • 5King SB,Lembo NJ,Weintraub WS,et al.A randomized trial comparing coronary angioplasty with coronary bypass surgery[].The New England Journal of Medicine.1994
  • 6Alderman E L,Andrews K,Madias J E,et al.Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease[].The New England Journal of Medicine.1996
  • 7Bourassa MG,Holubkov R,Yeh W,et al.Strategy of complete revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary disease (a report from the 1985-1986 NHLBI PTCA Registry)[].The American Journal of Cardiology.1992
  • 8RITA trial participants.Coronary anigoplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina(RITA) trial[].The Lancet.1993
  • 9Henderson RA,Pocock SJ,Sharp SJ,et al.Long-term results of RITA-1 trial: clinical and cost comparisons of coronary angioplasty and coronary-artery bypass grafting[].The Lancet.1998
  • 10Hamm CW,Reimers J,Ischinger T,et al.A randomized stud of coronary angioplasty compared with byapss surgery in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary disease[].The New England Journal of Medicine.1994

共引文献152

同被引文献68

引证文献7

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部