期刊文献+

经尿道等离子体电汽化切除术治疗高危型前列腺增生43例

Transurethral plasmakentic electrovaporization resection of prostate for high risk patients with BPH
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨经尿道等离子体电汽化切除术对高危型前列腺增生患者的疗效和安全性。方法:采用等离子体电汽化切除术治疗4 3例高危型前列腺增生患者,并对这些患者的术前、术中及术后一系列生理、生化指标进行记录比较。结果:手术时间为(48 2±19 2 )min ,术中出血量为(36±6 8)mL ,术后膀胱冲洗时间为(16 3±8 5 )h ,拔除尿管天数为(3 1±1 3)d ,无明显电解质及血糖波动,术后住院时间为(5 5±2 6 )d ;国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)从30 9±3 2下降到7 3±3 2 ,最大尿流率(Qmax)从(3 7±3 2 )mL·s- 1上升到(2 0 5±4 3)mL·s- 1;生活质量评分(QOL)从5 1±0 6下降到1 4±0 8,未发生严重的并发症。结论:经尿道前列腺等离子体电汽化切除术对高龄高危型患者安全性高、并发症少、疗效好。 Aim:To study the efficacy and safety of transurethral plasmakentic electrovaporization resectiion (TUPKEP) for high risk patients with BPH (benign prostatic hyperplasia, BPH). Methods: Forty-three BPH patients at high risk were treated by TUPKEP, and physiological and biochemical indexes were treated by TUPKEP, and physiological and biochemical indexes were recorded and compared perioperatively. Results: The intraoperative blood loss was (136±68) mL, operating time (48.2±19.2) min, postoperative bladder washout (BW) and catheterization time was (16.5±8.5) h and (3.1±1.3) d. No electrolyte, blood gluose disturbance happened. Postoperative hospitalization time was (5.5±2.6) d, IPSS dropped from 30.9±3.2 to 7.3±3.2, Qmax increased from 3.7±3.2 to 20.5±4.3, QOL decreased from 5.1±0.6 to 1.4±0.8. Conclusion:TUPKEP is very effective and safe for aged patients with BPH at high risk. However, further studies must be warranted.
出处 《暨南大学学报(自然科学与医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第2期262-264,共3页 Journal of Jinan University(Natural Science & Medicine Edition)
关键词 经尿道 等离子体电汽化切除术 良性前列腺增生 transurethral plasmakentic electrovaporization resection benign prostatic hyperplasia
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1章咏裳,庄乾元,周四维.腔内泌尿外科的一种新技术——经尿道前列腺汽化术[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1997,18(3):136-136. 被引量:103
  • 2王行环,王怀鹏,陈浩阳,刘久敏,罗耀雄,冯自卫,罗则民.经尿道等离子体双极电切术治疗良性前列腺增生及膀胱肿瘤[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2003,24(5):318-320. 被引量:267
  • 3CHANDRASEKOR P,KAPAASI F,VIRDI J.A prospective randomised study between transurethral vaporization using plasmakinetic energy and transurethral resection of prostate: Three year follow-up[J].European Urology Supplements,2004,3(2): 145.
  • 4NARAYAN P C,TEWARI A,GARZOTTO,et al.Transurethral vaportrode electrovaporization of the prostate: physical principles,technique,and results[J].Urology,1996,47(4): 505-510.
  • 5HOLTGREWE H,LOGAN.Current trends in management of men with lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic hyperplasia[J].Urology,1998,51(4): 1-7.
  • 6BOTTO H,LEBRET T,BARR? P,et al.Electrovaporization of the prostate with the Gyrus device[J].Journal of Endourology,2001,15(3): 313-316.
  • 7EATON A,FRANCIS R,DUNCAN N,et al.A randomised prospective study comparing the performance of the 4 mm plasma kinetic loop against standard monopolar TURP in prostates 40~100 gm size[J].European Urology Supplements,2004,3(2): 145.

二级参考文献5

  • 1Botto H,Lebret T, Barre P, et al. Electrovaporization of prostate with the Gyrus Device. J Endourol,2001,15 : 319-322.
  • 2Ramsey EW. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review. Can J Urol,2000,7 : 1135-1143.
  • 3Mebust W, Hohgrewe H, Coeket APC, et al. Transurethral prostectomy: immediate and post operative complication. A comparative study of 13 participating institution evaluating 3 885 patients. J Uro1,1989,141:243-247.
  • 4Virdi J, Kapasi F, Chandrasekar P, et al. A prospective randomized study between transurethral vaporization using plasmakinetic energy and transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol,2000,163 (4 suppl) :268-269.
  • 5Donovan JL, Peters TJ, Neal DE, et al. A randomized trial comparing transurethral resection of the prostate,laser therapy and conservative treatment of men with symptoms associated with benign pro6tatic enlargement : the CLasP study. J Urol,2000 ,164 :65-70.

共引文献366

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部