期刊文献+

地下管线的有效应力地震反应分析 被引量:12

Analysis of Seismic Response of Underground Pipelines in Terms of Effective Stress
下载PDF
导出
摘要 地下管线的地震反应与管线周围土体的动力特性以及管土之间的相互作用密切相关。在地震作用下,孔隙水压力的发展会导致土体有效应力的降低,并且影响土体的动力特性。根据有效应力方法以及土体的非线性动力本构模型,可以研究孔隙水压力的增长与消散、有效应力的降低以及土动力特性的变化。在地下管线与周围土体之间引入接触单元,来模拟管土之间的接触传递问题;通过有限单元法,对地下管线的地震反应进行了全过程地震反应分析的数值模拟。计算结果表明:在地震作用下,孔隙水压力的增长造成了土体的软化,使得土体的动力特性发生变化,因此管线的地震响应也发生了相应的变化。 Because of remarkable nonlinear behavior and solid-liquid two-phase character of the soil under seismic loads, the soil dynamic properties will be changed significantly. The dynamic intensity and the deformation of soil are mostly depended on the development of pore water pressure. Both of them will influence the dynamic response of the soil-pipeline system. Therefore, the increase of vibrant pore water pressure and the reduction of effective stress should be taken into acount for their effects on soil dynamic properties. On the other hand, the coupling between the dissipation and the re-distribution of pore water pressure and the soil frame response should also be considered. In this paper, the soil surrounding the pipeline is regarded as a solid-liquid two-phase medium. The effective stress method and nonlinear constitutive relation model of soil are used to study the development and the dissipation of pore water pressure during a seismic process. At the same time, the contact interface model is adopted to simulate the interaction between the pipeline and the surrounding soil. Using the program SRUPFE based on the theory of this paper, a numerical simulation of the full-process analysis for an underground pipeline can be gained accurately. From the results of calculations, the development of the pore water pressure leads to the soil softening which causes the change of the soil dynamical characters, and the spectrum identities of soil-pipeline system are also changed. Under horizontal seismic loads, for the stress of pipeline, the axial stress is much more than the flexural stress. Moreover, the seismic response of soil-pipeline system changes with the variation of the soil softening level.
作者 艾晓秋 李杰
出处 《防灾减灾工程学报》 CSCD 2005年第1期1-7,共7页 Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金委优秀创新研究群体科学基金资助项目(50321803)
关键词 地下管线 地震反应 有效应力 有限单元 underground pipeline seismic response effective stress finite element
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1M.D. Trifunac, M. I. Todorovska. Northridge, California, earthquake of 1994: density of Pipe breakes and surface strains[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1997, (16): 193-207.
  • 2W.W. Chen, B. Shih, Y. C. Chen, et al. Seismic response of natural gas and water pipelines in the Ji-Ji earthquake [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2002, (22): 1209-1214.
  • 3T. Ariman, G. E. Muleski. A review of the response of buried pipelines under seismic excitations[J]. International Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structure Dynamics, 1981, (9): 133-151.
  • 4T.K. Datta. Seismic response of buried pipelines: a state-of-the-art review[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1999,(192): 271-284.
  • 5梁建文.地下管线地震反应和稳定性研究述评[J].天津大学学报,1996,29(3):427-434. 被引量:6
  • 6H.B. Seed, I. M. Idriss. Pore-water pressure change during soil liquefaction[J]. Journal of Geotechnical &Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 1976, 102(4): 323-346.
  • 7D.S. Liyanapathirana, H. G.. Poulos. Numerical simulation of soil liquefaction due to earthquake loading[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake engineering,2002, (22): 511-523.
  • 8M.A. Biot. General theory of three dimensional consolidation [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1941,(12):155-164.
  • 9R.E. Goodman, R. L. Taylor and T. L. Berkke[J]. A Model for the mechanics of jointed rock, ASCE,1968,94(3): 637-659.
  • 10G. W. Clough, J. M. Duncan. Finite element analysis of retaining wall behavior[J]. Journal of Soil Mech &Found Div ASCE, 1971, 97(12): 1657-1674.

二级参考文献47

共引文献5

同被引文献121

引证文献12

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部