期刊文献+

国产与进口头孢吡肟治疗泌尿系感染随机单盲对照临床研究 被引量:9

Randomized controlled multicentric clinical trial of domestic and imported cefepime in the treatment of acute urinary infections
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价国产与进口头孢吡肟治疗急性中重度泌尿系统感染的有效性和安全性.方法用区组随机平行对照、多中心单盲试验设计,用进口头孢吡肟作对照药.共入组127例病例,剔除5例,进入疗效分析病例数为122例,其中试验组61例,对照组61例.国产和进口头孢吡肟均为每次给药2 g,30~60min内静脉点滴,bid,疗程7~14天.结果治疗结束后,临床有效率分别为试验组98.36%,对照组96.72%;试验组与对照组致病菌清除率均为100%.2组药物不良反应发生率分别为6.45%和10.77%.2组对比差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论国产与进口头孢吡肟对急性泌尿系统感染均安全、有效. Objective To compare the clinical and bacterial efficacy and safety of domestic and imported cefepime in the treatment of moderate to severe urinary tract infection. Methods A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in the treatment of patients with urinary tract infection. One hundred and twenty seven patients were enrolled in the trial, 5 patients were withdrawn. There were 61 cases in domestic group and 61 cases in imported group assessable respectively. Both drugs were given intravenously 2 g for urinary tract infection respectively within 30 to 60 minutes by infusion,twice daily. The duration of treatment was 7 to14 days in both groups. Results The overall clinical efficacy rate of domestic and imported group was 98.36% and 96.72%, the bacterial eradication rate both was 100%, and the incidence of adverse reaction was 6.45% and 10.77% respectively. The difference was no significant between two groups. Conclusion Domestic cefepime is as effective and safe as imported one in the treatment of moderate and severe urinary tract infection.
出处 《中国临床药理学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第2期83-86,共4页 The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
关键词 头孢吡肟 急性泌尿系统感染 抗感染 cefepime acute urinary tract infection antinfection
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Barradell LB, Bryson HM. Cefepime, a review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use [ J ]. Drugs, 1994;47:471 - 505.
  • 2Hancock REN, Bellido F. Antibacterial in vitro activity of fourth generation cephalosporins [ J ]. J Chemother, 1996; 8 ( Suppl. 2 ): S31 -S34.
  • 3Holloway WJ, Palmer D. Clinical application of a new parenteral antibiotic in the treatment of severe bacterial infection[J]. Am J Med, 1996;100: 52 - 59.
  • 4Karlowsky JA, Jones ME, Thornsberry C, et al. Trends in antimicrobial susceptibilities among Enterobacteriaceae isolated from hospitalized patients in the United States from 1998 to 2001 [ J ]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2003 ;47:1672 - 1680.
  • 5Fritsche TR, Sader HS, Jones RN. Comparative activity and spectrum of broad - spectrum beta - lactams ( cefepime, ceftazidime, cefriaxone,piperacillin/tazobactam) tested against 12295 staphylococci and streptococci: report from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program (North America: 2001 -2002 ) [ J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis,2003; 47: 435 - 440.
  • 6Rhomberg PR, Jones RN, MYSTIC Program (USA) Study Group.Antimicrobial spectrum of activity for meropenem and nine broad spectrum antimicrobials: report from the MYSTIC Program (2002) in North America[ J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2003 ;47:365 -372.
  • 7Sader HS, Biedenbach DJ, Jones RN. Global patterns of susceptibility for 21 commonly utilized antimicrobial agents tested against 48,440 Enterobacteriaceae in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program( 1997 -2001 ) [ J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2003 ;47:361 -364.
  • 8Rybak M. The pharmacokinetic profile of a new generation of parenteral cephalosporin[J]. Am J Med, 1996; 100:39-44.
  • 9Wise R. Tissue penetration of the fourth generation parenteral cephalosporins[J]. J Chemother, 1996;8(Suppl. 2) :S63 -S70.
  • 10Chang SC, Fang CT, Hsueh PR, et al. Efficacy and safety of cefepime treatment in Chinese patients with severe bacterial infections: in comparison with ceftazidime treatment[ J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 1998;10:245 - 248.

同被引文献64

引证文献9

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部