期刊文献+

关于《广东新语》中两篇非屈大均写的文章 被引量:1

On the Two Chapters of Guangdong Xinyu Not Written by Qu Da-jun
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《广东新语》的作者是屈大均。但该书中的端州山水章却标明是何所撰述,端溪砚石章则标明是高兆所撰述。无论从题目名称抑或从具体内容来看,此两章与全书的撰述体例及与屈大均谋篇设目的宗旨不相吻合。经分析可知,此两章文字原非《广东新语》所有,是屈大均受某些特殊原因所驱使或出于某种考虑,才将它们加插到《广东新语》中去的,添加时间是在康熙二十六年之后。由于此两章文字的撰写时间及其被收入《广东新语》中去的时间皆可考,故凭此能说明《广东新语》在康熙二十六年时已经刊刻成书的说法欠妥。 Guangdong xinyu was written by Qu DA-jun. But two chapters of which were not written by him. The chapter of Duanzhou Shanshui is ascribed to He Pan, and the chapter of Duanxi yanshi is ascribed to Gao Zhao. Considering either the title or the concrete contents of which, both do not match the style of the whole book. Through analysis, we know that these two chapters were not originally included in Guangdong Xinyu. After the 26 th year of Kangxi emperor's reign, driven by some particular impetus or consideration, Qu Da-jun added these two chapters to the book. Because the date on which these chapters were written and the time when they were added to the book can be ascertained, so, we can say for certain that it's incorrect to state that Guangdong xinyu was printed in the 26th year of Kangxi emperor's reign.
作者 杨皑
出处 《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第2期96-99,111,共5页 Journal of South China Normal University:Social Science Edition
关键词 《广东新语》 屈大均 何磻 高兆 Guangdong Xinyu Qu Da-jun He Pan Gao Zhao
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1李育中.《广东新语注》[M].广东人民出版社,1991年版.第113页第103注.
  • 2清人王晫 张潮编纂.《端溪砚石考》[A].清人王晫、张潮编纂.《檀几丛书初集》卷四十五[C].上海古籍出版社,1992年出版过影印本..

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部