摘要
现代主义小说中以人物“他”的眼光叙述的作品逐渐增多,但由于受现实生活中的言语习惯影响,人们对这个新出现的叙述者“他”不予认可,往往以文本中个别的视角越界和叙述话语不符叙述者身份来否定“他”的叙述者地位。但是我们若把“他”的叙述与第一人称叙述者“我”的叙述加以比较,就可以发现这些否定理由并不能成立。通过比较分析,我们可以得到使“他”的叙述者地位得以认可的三点前提性认识。
In the modernist novels, the works that were narrated through the character visual angles of HE are increasing .But by the effect of language of actual life ,HE was denied as a narrator by the argument that there are many overstepped visual angles and the discourses are not in keeping with HE in the narrative of HE, though HE is a de facto new narrator. Through the comparing of the narratives of HE and I, we can see that those arguments are unreasonable. Further more, through the comparing we find three prerequisites that is the ground to guarantee the narrator status of HE.
出处
《绥化学院学报》
2005年第2期71-73,共3页
Journal of Suihua University