期刊文献+

MSU-S_(MFI)和MCM-41的催化裂化及烷基化活性比较

Comparison on the Catalytic Cracking and Alkylation Activities between MSU-S_(MFI) and MCM-41 Aluminosilicates
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以MFI沸石前驱体作为基本结构单元组装介孔硅铝分子筛MSU-SMFI.XRD和氮气吸附数据表明MSU-SMFI具有类似MCM-41的六方排列介孔孔道结构,而且其织构参数和以传统方法合成的含铝MCM-41也大体相当.NH3-TPD显示由沸石前驱体组装的MSU-SMFI较硅铝比相同的含铝MCM-41介孔分子筛的固体酸量显著提高.MSU-SMFI上的异丙苯催化裂化转化率比含铝MCM-41提高31%,1,3,5-三异丙苯在MSU-SMFI上也发生了更深的裂解.MSU-SMFI上萘的叔丁基化的转化率比含铝MCM-41提高了15%.以沸石前驱体作为基本结构单元是提高介孔分子筛固体酸性的有效方法. Mesoporous aluminosilicates MSU-S-MFI with well-ordered hexagonal symmetry were assembled from MFI zeolitic precursors containing abundant protozeolitic nanoclusters. Normal MCM-41 was synthesized by using tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) and sodium aluminate as silica source and aluminum source, respectively. The pore diameter of MSU-S-MFI sample and normal MCM-41 both are 2.70 nm, and their BET specific surface areas and pore volumes are comparable as seen from XRD and N-2 sorption results. Although both MSU-S-MFI and MCM-41 possess weak acidic sites and medium strong acidic sites in NH3-TPD profiles, the density of weak acidic sites and medium strong acidic sites in MSU-Smm are much higher than that of MCM-41. The catalytic cracking conversion of cumene on MSU-S-MFI is 31% higher than that on MCM-41 with the same Si/Al ratio, and the butylation conversion of naphthalene over MSU-Smm is 15% higher than that on the MCM-41 sample. Incorporation of MFI zeolitic nanoclusters into the mesostructured framework of MSU-S-MFI led to enhanced acidity.
出处 《物理化学学报》 SCIE CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第3期324-327,共4页 Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica
基金 国家重点基础研究专项经费(G2000048001) 山西省青年科学基金(20041012)资助项目~~
关键词 介孔分子筛 催化裂化 烷基化 酸性 沸石前驱体 MESOPOROUS MOLECULAR-SIEVES ALUMINUM-CHLORIDE NAPHTHALENE ISOPROPYLATION ZEOLITES SITES
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1张铭金,陈诵英,沈士德,孙予罕,吴东.沸石分子筛催化剂上萘的择形异丙基化反应性能[J].催化学报,2000,21(2):143-146. 被引量:22
  • 2Kresge,C.T.;Leonowicz,M.E.;Roth,W.J.;Vartuli,J.C.; Beck,J.S.Nature,1992,359:710.
  • 3Beck,J.S.;Vartuli,J.C.;Roth,W.J.;Leonowicz,M.E.; Kresge,C.T.;Schmitt,K.D.;Chu,C.T.W.;Olson,D.H.; Sheppard,E.W.;McCullen,S.B.;Higgins,J.B.;Schlenker,J.L. J.Am.Chem.Soc.,1992,114:10834.
  • 4Corma,A.;Forné s,V.;Navarro,M.T.;Pé rez-Pariente,J. J.Catal.,1994,148:569.
  • 5On,D.T.;Desplantier-Giscard,D.;Danumah,C.;Kaliaguine,S. Applied Catalysis A:General,2001,222:299.
  • 6Liu,Y.;Zhang,W.Z.;Pinnavaia,T.J.Angew.Chem.Int.Ed., 2001,40:1255.
  • 7Zhang,Z.T.;Han,Y.;Xiao,F.S.;Qiu,S.L.;Zhu,L.;Wang, R.W.;Yu,Y.;Zhang,Z.;Zhou,B.S.;Wang,Y.Q.;Zhao,D.Y.Angew.Chem.Int.Ed.,2001,40:1258.
  • 8Javier,A.;Isabel,D.;Carlos,M.-.;Joaquí n,P.P.;Enrique,S. Chem.Commun.,2003,150.
  • 9郑均林,张晔,魏伟,吴东,孙予罕,邓风,罗晴,岳勇.具有强酸性位的高水热稳定介孔分子筛的合成[J].物理化学学报,2003,19(10):907-912. 被引量:8
  • 10Zhu,L.;Xiao,F.S.;Zhang,Z.T.;Sun,Y.Y.;Han,Y.;Qiu, S.L.Catalysis Today,2001,68:209.

二级参考文献19

  • 1王树国 李英 巩雁军 吴东 孙予罕 钟炳.物理化学学报(WuliHuaxue Xuebao),2001,17:397-397.
  • 2李工 阚秋斌 吴通好 章慧杰.化学学报(HuaxueXuebao),2002,60(5):1350-1350.
  • 3Beck JC T,E W,J Am S, Vartuli J C, Roth W J, Leonowicz M E, Kresge Schmitt, K D, Chu C T W, Olson D H, Sheppard,McCuUen S B, Higgins J B, Schlenker J L.Chem Soc, 1992, 114:10834.
  • 4On D T, Desplantier-Giscard D, Damumah C, Kaliaguine S. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2001, 222:299.
  • 5Corma A. Chem Rev, 1997, 97:2373.
  • 6Zhang Z T,Han Y, Xiao F S, Qiu S L, Zhu L, Wang R W, Yu Y, Zhang Z, Zhou B S, Wang Y Q, Zhao D Y. J Am Chem Soc,2001, 123:5014.
  • 7Liu Y, Zhang W Z, Pinnavaia T J. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2001, 40:1255.
  • 8Zhang Z T, Han Y ,Xiao F S, Qiu S L ,Zhu L ,Wang R W, Yu Y, Zhang Z, Zhou B S ,Wang Y Q, Zhao D Y. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl,2001, 40:1258.
  • 9Hart Y, Xiao F S, Wu S, Sun Y Y, Meng X J, Li D S,Lin S, Deng F, Ai X J. J Phys Chem B, 2001, 105: 7963.
  • 10Huo Q S, Margolese D I, Clesia U, Feng P Y, Gler T E, Sleger P, Leon R, Petroff P M, Schuth F, Stucky G D. Nature, 1994, 368:24.

共引文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部