期刊文献+

髋臼骨折手术内固定治疗探讨 被引量:2

The Operative Treatment of Acetabular Fractures with Internal Fixation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨手术内固定治疗有移位髋臼骨折的疗效。方法 回顾性总结2 1例有移位髋臼骨折手术治疗的经验,2 1例损伤严重程度评分(ISS)平均2 1.1分,根据骨折类型选用髂腹股沟入路8例,Kocher- L angenbeck入路8例,前后联合入路3例,延长的髂腹股沟入路和三射入路各1例。复位后应用骨盆重建钢板及拉力螺钉内固定。结果 2 1例经12~5 6个月平均36个月随访,发生感染2例,创伤性关节炎6例,异位骨化5例,股骨头无菌性坏死1例。复位按Matta方法评估,解剖复位6例,满意复位12例,不满意复位3例。按Matta髋关节功能评分标准评估疗效,优7例,良10例,一般3例,差1例,优良率80 .9%。结论 对有移位的髋臼骨折,应根据骨折类型采取不同手术入路,掌握手术时机、术者的经验、术中良好的复位是提高疗效的关键。 Objective To investigate the effect of operative treatment with internal fixation of displaced acetabular fractures. Methods 21 cases displaced acetabular fractures were treated operatively with open reduction and internal fixation using reconstruction plates lag screws. The mean of injury severity score(ISS)is 21.1. According to fracture types, Ilioinguinal approach was adopted in 8 cases, Kocher-Langenbeck in 8 cases, and double approachs(K-L added up ilio)in 3 cases. Extended iliofemoral approach in 1 case and triradiate approach in 1 case. Results All patients underwent average 36 months(range 12 to 56 months). Infection was observed in 2 cases, traumatic osteoarthritis in 6 cases, heterotopic ossification in 5 cases, avascular necrosis of the femoral head in 1 case. According to criteria of Matta, 6 cases were underwent anatomic reduction, 12 cases were satisfactory reduction and 3 unsatisfactory. Based on Matta′s evaluation, 7 cases achieved excellent results, 10 good, 3 fair and 1 poor. Excellent and good rate was 80.9%. Conclusion Choice for surgical approach, operation on time, surgeon′s experience, anatomical reduction are the key points for reaching a good clinical result.
出处 《实用骨科杂志》 2005年第2期112-115,共4页 Journal of Practical Orthopaedics
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1孙俊英,唐天驷,洪天禄,董天华.移位髋臼横形骨折的诊断和治疗[J].中华骨科杂志,1996,16(9):540-543. 被引量:50
  • 2Matta JM.Operative treatment of acetabular fractures through ilionguinal approach[J].Clin Orthop,1994,10:19.
  • 3Matta JM,Angeles L.Fractures of the acetabulum:Accuracy of reduction and clinical Results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury[J].J Bone and Joint Surg(Am),1996,78:1632-1645.
  • 4Ruesch PD,Holder H,Ciaramitaro M,et al.A Prospective study surgically treated acetabular fractures[J].Clin Orthop,1994,305:38-46.
  • 5Alonso LE,Davila R,Bradley E.Extended iliofemoral versus triradiate approaches in management of associated acetabular fractures[J].Clin Orthop,1994,305:81-87.
  • 6Helfet DL,Schmeling GJ.Management of complex acetabular fractures through single nonextensile exposures[J].Clin Orthop,1994,305:58-68.
  • 7Liebergall M,Mosheiff R,Low J,et al.Acetabular fractures[J].Clin Orthop,1999,366:205-216.
  • 8Johnson EE,Matta JM,Mast JW,et al.Delayed reconstruction of acetabular fractures 21-120 days following injury[J].Clin Orthop,1994,305:20-30.
  • 9Letournel E.The treatment of acetabular fractures through the ilioningunal approach[J].Clin Orthop,1993,292:62-76.
  • 10Mears DC,Veyvis JH.Acute total hip for selected displaced acetabular fractures:two to twelve-year results[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Am),2002,84:2103-2105.

二级参考文献3

  • 1孙俊英,中华创伤杂志,1994年,10卷,110页
  • 2孙俊英,中华骨科杂志,1994年,14卷,132页
  • 3孙俊英,中华骨科杂志,1992年,12卷,350页

共引文献49

同被引文献2

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部