非概念性法学中的事实、价值与行为

Value and Action in Nonconceptual Jurisprudence

作为大多数法学理论著述的一种范式 ,非概念性法学涵盖了十分丰富的内容 ,其目标 ,就是要陈述那些经得住反驳的、有知识旨趣的问题 ,以及法律及其后果的社会作用问题。所以 ,非概念性法学理论都是可证伪的。法学对话 (Legaldialogue)则为检测非概念性法学理论提供了至关重要的途径。因而所有的主张 (无论是明确的主张还是隐含的主张 )都是法学对话参与者试图表达其不同观点的手段 ,而他们所要表达的这些截然不同的观点 ,莫过于以下三大类 ,即 :事实。

As a paradigm for much legal literature, nonconceptual jurisprudence conveys in abundance. The goal of nonconceptual theory is to state something intellectually interesting and socially useful about the law and its effects that can withstand disproof. That is to say, nonconceptual jurisprudence are falsifiable. Legal dialogue provides the crucible for testing theories of nonconceptual jurisprudence. This paper suggestion if that all assertions(made of implied) are means by which participants in legal dialogue attempt representations about one of three very different things: fact, value and action.